The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Lol 2012 was insanely backloaded.The 2012 Giro d'Italia had a perfectly fine course and was a borefest. The 2009 Giro d'Italia had a pretty lame route design by Giro standards and was quite entertaining. Actually far more entertaining than the 2008 edition that suffered badly from wrong positioning of the mountain stages.
In the end the riders indeed make the race. The combination of a hard climb to provoke long range attacks followed by a false flat mtf to make those attacks stick has worked off so many times since Les Deux Alpes 1998. Even though this climb really was too long with 20 kilometers.
If Bardet was still in the race and in last Sunday's shape, Carapaz might've actually being forced to attack on the penultimate climb to test the waters with the Frenchman. Now there's simply no need for him to risk such exploits. He can just wait for Santa Cristina to make his move and get his 2 minutes on Almeida. Hindley likely ain't no worry for the Equadorian anyway.
That said, this stage likely always would have been for a Rasmussen like mountain escape.
It's the Kolovrat - Castelmonte stage that's going to suffer from the fact that Carapaz doesn't need to go from far. Unless Hindley surprises us big time of course. Also, why isn't that stage on Ascension like the 2002 Dolomites stage?
when attack is in the bagNibali: Tailwind meant it was pointless to attack on stage 15 of the Giro d'Italia"
Ok, so when it's headwind it's pointless to attack. And when it's tailwind it's pointless to attack.
sooooo.... when is it pointful to attack?
When he says soNibali: Tailwind meant it was pointless to attack on stage 15 of the Giro d'Italia"
Ok, so when it's headwind it's pointless to attack. And when it's tailwind it's pointless to attack.
sooooo.... when is it pointful to attack?
Carapaz won't win.I think everyone has accepted that Carapaz will win this Giro now. That's why they have no more motivation to fight for GC.
I think everyone has accepted that Carapaz will win this Giro now. That's why they have no more motivation to fight for GC.
Could be quite nice for a final mountain stage if you go crazy on the climbs before, or simply as an MTT. But this is gonna be a nothingburger most of the time.Cogne better had paid a lot more than anyone was willing to offer to host this abomination of a MTF.
I think it was the first stage that really suffered from the lack of ITTs. If Almeida was 2 minutes ahead of Carapaz, I think it would have been ridden aggressively.Could be quite nice for a final mountain stage if you go crazy on the climbs before, or simply as an MTT. But this is gonna be a nothingburger most of the time.
Paging @Big DoopieI think it was the first stage that really suffered from the lack of ITTs. If Almeida was 2 minutes ahead of Carapaz, I think it would have been ridden aggressively.
With "back problems" apparently nowadays being Jumbos favorite excuse to not seem laughable, it could indeed have been a hunger knock though!he had back problems after the 1st descend. He said in an interview after the race