- Feb 20, 2012
- 53,905
- 44,292
- 28,180
To me it's basically the equivalent of Dwars door Vlaanderen but without any of the benefit of being a good light final tuneup for De Ronde.I agree but I wonder if in the long term this continuum will rather weaken the standing of this race than strengthen it. I agree it neatly fits as a link between the Flanders and AGR (PR really is the odd one out here) but with the favorites of those two races now being mostly the same, the guys who would also be favored in Brabant will often leave it out as they would simply overrace themselves.
If they are more of a northern classics type they won't do this race in between Roubaix and AGR and if they are more of a hilly classics specialist they won't want to race too much before LBL. That basically leaves us with guys who would be good in both the AGR and the Ronde but neither focus on PR nor LBL and there just aren't that many such guys around. Don't know if that's a trend but least this year it's noticable.
To me there's nothing that can be realy done for Brabantse Pijl to grow that race in the long term. Top guns don't really have much incentive to race it, and it's more like you need to dodge multiple exclusion criteria, and the incentive for the lesser riders is that they actually have a shot at winning it.
I also think the archetype for this race is probably the weakest in the current peloton.
And I frankly don't believe those sorts of fields were ever sustainable.But the calendar was normal in 2019 and then Van der Poel outsprinted Alaphilippe, Wellens and Matthews to take the win. Even if the biggest names dominate today, the top-4 will pale compared to that one.
Maybe the Wellens and the Matthews types are the sorts of riders you want to retain. The odd Ardennes/sprinter hybrids for who Amstel is too hard are probably the best sort of riders who would want to systematically target this race.
