Tre cime di lavaredo is a proper queen mountain stage. But i'm a bit disappointed with no rumours about zoncolan,mortirolo, gavia, Stelvio, finestre.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Tre cime di lavaredo is a proper queen mountain stage. But i'm a bit disappointed with no rumours about zoncolan,mortirolo, gavia, Stelvio, finestre.
Yep, probably if we're discussing specific resorts. But they have completely stopped doing the classic "big climb - small climb" combo after 2020, and rather shorter and steep MTFs like Sega di Ala, Fedaia, Lavarone, Alpe di Mera, etc., I don't think that is a coincidence, it is probably a deliberate strategy from RCS.I believe, that for climbs like Mortirolo, Stelvio, Gavia or Finestre, the nearby ski towns of Bormio, Aprica or Sestriere have to host the stage finish. So if those cities are not willing to pay for a finish, the finish won't be there.
The Giro needs a big mountain stage before the last week, and this now seems like the only opportunity. Depending on where they are starting the stage (hopefully in the town or at least valley of Aosta), it should be quite possible to add at least two climbs between GSB and Crand Montana. The best options would probably be Ovronnaz and at least Anzere. The latter should really be done just before Crans.I am interested (and soon to be disappointed I guess) how the stage to Crans Montana will look like. If the Giro climbs from Italy to Switzerland over the Passo Gran San Bernardo, they have a lot of options between the Bernardo and Crans Montana. Before entering the Rhone valley after the descent the peloton could climb over either the Lac de Champex, Col du Lein or Croix de Coeur. Afterwards the could climb up towards some ski towns, namely Ovronnaz, Dailon and/or Anzére (all north of the Rhone valley). So this stage could become also a kind of queen stage with about or more then 5000 altitude meters, or it just could be |long climb - long flat valley - not so hard summit finish|
I'm pretty sure that is never going to happen. I'll be more than satisfied if they do Overonnaz and Anzere before Crans. Also and more importantly, I think and hope they should descend only to Lens after Anzere before climbing the shortest route the last section to Crans.This one has about 6000 meters of altitude gained. Might be to much, but the double of Anzère and Crans Montana really looks quiet good.
According to local article today, the second ITT will be on stage 9, from Savignano to Cesena, "little more than 30 km".
Should be mostly flat.
stage 8 is gonna finish in Fossombrone, I doubt it will have any big climbs.So any slight chance of a proper Mountain stage would hinge on stage 8?
With proper I mean something that involves Petrano, Nerone, Catria, Carpegna or at least some of them.
View: https://mobile.twitter.com/giroditalia/status/1575070130824163329
Profile of the Campo Imperatore stage here from twitter.
View: https://mobile.twitter.com/giroditalia/status/1575070130824163329
Profile of the Campo Imperatore stage here from twitter.
Glad the MTF is stage 7 rather than 8, with the ITT stage 9.
It's the same one as the 2018 Giro, at least the last 140km.
Given the scale I'd say it will be about the same length, maybe a bit shorter.
Here the 2018 stage. The last 145 seems to be the same. Only the first part of the stage seems somewhat easier and shorter for next year.
If you count the final climb as one, it's almost 45 k uphill. Only some really short downhills and flat parts. Favorites will always wait for the final part. But if a team likes to drill it on the Calascio, difference in the final 5 k, still could be decent.