Giro d'Italia 2023 Giro d'Italia, Stage 13: Borgofranco d’Ivrea – Crans Montana, 199 km (Friday, May 19th)

Page 13 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
May 29, 2019
11,210
11,702
23,180
Bravo Vegni. Some serious brass balls. Integrity of Giro ahead of the mob. That is on how it should be.
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,186
29,831
28,180
Typical sports fan response this. The level of contempt most sports fans have for athletes is truly nauseating. If you're in favour of labour protections, you can't pick and choose when it comes to the reasonableness of demands. Be honest about what you want to see riders do to themselves or stay quiet.

Riders rightly don't trust race organisers, so I say go for it. Anyone who's having a tantrum because they don't get exactly what they want isn't worth the time of day.
What is the real life equivalent to the first 120 km today?

I'm not aware of any labour protections in real life that stop outdoor workdays during winter in the rain. None.
 

Elos Anjos

BANNED
May 23, 2022
1,778
3,294
10,180
This kind of decision - and I'm not addressing how it was taken, either if it was Vegni or the riders - would have stopped Pantani from going crazy in a descent to gain time in Giro and Tour 1998.

Riders have a different set of physical (w/Kg), psychological (fearlessness) and spiritual (fortitude) virtues and all those matter for winning a race. Canceling and shortening a stage is then about putting some virtues above others and thus selecting some riders over others. No one now can tell if Caruso or Vine or Buitrago would have done with a longer stage.

This is the new era of sponsor and rating bias. It's all for the show.
 
  • Like
Reactions: staubsauger
Mar 31, 2015
10,192
4,952
28,180
Typical sports fan response this. The level of contempt most sports fans have for athletes is truly nauseating. If you're in favour of labour protections, you can't pick and choose when it comes to the reasonableness of demands. Be honest about what you want to see riders do to themselves or stay quiet.

Riders rightly don't trust race organisers, so I say go for it. Anyone who's having a tantrum because they don't get exactly what they want isn't worth the time of day.
I'm quite open to race shortenings (personally), especially because the way cyclists are they are very prone to quite bad illnesses and diseases, and I'm not sure a lot of them are paid enough to warrant it.

That said, I don't think this stage is being shortened on its own merits. I think the weather of the past two weeks has changed riders' perceptions of what they are willing to ride, and while this is understandable, it's also unfair on the viewer/fans, for whom this is the first big mountain stage. I am not convinced, in this particular case, it is a fair compromise

As others have said, riding 220km on Monday in absolutely wretched conditions put their health more at risk, and could've been shortened to allow for the more big ticket stages to remain. Perhaps organisers and riders should have thought more long/medium term about it all, as this stage has definitely been shortened as a consequence of the first 12 stages, rather than the weather today.
 

Scarponi

BANNED
Apr 21, 2015
5,135
2,789
23,180
When Rog drops a watts bomb later today, no one will remember any of this drama.

And IMO despite the heated arguments & vocal complaints, most people love this stuff (even subconsciously), i.e. all the handwringing, name calling, finding culprits, blame game etc. adds to the mystique & folklore of Grande Casino GT racing.

Today's drama will be old news real fast & something new will become the focal point of debates.
Everyone remembers 2014 it’s bad for the sport
 
Typical sports fan response this. The level of contempt most sports fans have for athletes is truly nauseating. If you're in favour of labour protections, you can't pick and choose when it comes to the reasonableness of demands. Be honest about what you want to see riders do to themselves or stay quiet.

Riders rightly don't trust race organisers, so I say go for it. Anyone who's having a tantrum because they don't get exactly what they want isn't worth the time of day.

I have the utmost respect for labour protections for people who work in extreme conditions and earn less than a respectable wage for the work they do.

This guys are 'living the dream', they earn well, some of them millions a year and that's only because of the fans. If there weren't any fans to watch them, the Tour or the Giro would matter 0 and they would earn nothing due to being a factor on those races.

What this riders give to the fans with this kind of decisions is contempt.

Of course if there are threats to riders lives, the stages should be amended or canceled, but any of the evidence regarding today's stage supports that idea? Rain is not a threat for anyone, or the dozens of recreational riders I see riding on rainy sundays around my area are all kamikaze crazies. And they are even more ridicule to cancel a pass, keeping the most dangerous one. If this decision was in name of safety, that wouldn't be the alteration required.
 
Jul 25, 2012
12,967
1,970
25,680
We only have the same conversation over and over again because Vegni gives in. Make it clear that no matter if concerns are raised by 1 or 100 riders, only concerns with merit about the safety of the riders made as soon as they reasonably could be made would be met with open ears.

Let the riders strike, or try to, if they don't like what they signed up to. But don't give in to complaints without merit. Better if only 50 riders make it to Rome, if the rest don't want to do the race they have started.
Sure, if you think that'll work. I personally think it's a great way to kill participation in the Giro from top racers and ultimately kill it as a race.

'only concerns with merit about the safety of the riders made as soon as they reasonably could be made would be met with open ears.' This feels pretty ambiguous though, you';ll have to come up with some clear guidelines to define it.
 
Oct 19, 2011
2,991
1,668
14,680
Do you seriously believe the riders would have not found a reason to complain regardless?
The weather is not an issue. The roads are fine.
You may right, but it would have been much less incentive to cancel if they were to do a couple of passes of 1600-1700m than Coeur at almost 2200.
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,186
29,831
28,180
Sure, if you think that'll work. I personally think it's a great way to kill participation in the Giro from top racers and ultimately kill it as a race.

'only concerns with merit about the safety of the riders made as soon as they reasonably could be made would be met with open ears.' This feels pretty ambiguous though, you';ll have to come up with some clear guidelines to define it.
I doubt it's ambiguous enough to include the unwillingness to ride the first 120 km today.
 
Jul 4, 2009
2,791
2,519
17,180
Typical sports fan response this. The level of contempt most sports fans have for athletes is truly nauseating. If you're in favour of labour protections, you can't pick and choose when it comes to the reasonableness of demands. Be honest about what you want to see riders do to themselves or stay quiet.

Riders rightly don't trust race organisers, so I say go for it. Anyone who's having a tantrum because they don't get exactly what they want isn't worth the time of day.

But "labour protections" doesn't really apply for sports, since they are competing directly against each other, and they are not hired by the race organizers.

There has to be a committee to make the decisions in this kind of cases. The riders could be represented by one or two guys in that committee.

In a broader perspective, you could define some more precise criteria about the weather, such as the amount of rain accepted. It wouldn't be my cup of tea necessarily, but the randomness of the current situation annoys me.
 
May 14, 2017
1,281
1,049
13,680
I'm quite open to race shortenings (personally), especially because the way cyclists are they are very prone to quite bad illnesses and diseases, and I'm not sure a lot of them are paid enough to warrant it.

That said, I don't think this stage is being shortened on its own merits. I think the weather of the past two weeks has changed riders' perceptions of what they are willing to ride, and while this is understandable, it's also unfair on the viewer/fans, for whom this is the first big mountain stage. I am not convinced, in this particular case, it is a fair compromise

As others have said, riding 220km on Monday in absolutely wretched conditions put their health more at risk, and could've been shortened to allow for the more big ticket stages to remain. Perhaps organisers and riders should have thought more long/medium term about it all, as this stage has definitely been shortened as a consequence of the first 12 stages, rather than the weather today.
The serious take is that given the state of labour organisation in cycling it's inevitable that rider demands will often somewhat spontaneous in response to race design or lack of race organiser response to circumstances. In this case it's bad weather combined with illness and a lot of dropouts. People who are complaining about the number of dropouts etc compromising the race and want everything to go ahead as planned are delusional.
 
Jun 25, 2015
5,335
5,424
23,180
Weather is always a factor in pro cycling. Unless there is a real danger, they should ride. Is this worse than the Cortina stage that Bernal won?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Mar 31, 2015
10,192
4,952
28,180
Imagine if this current crop had to do the 2010 giro with that weather and route lol
Bit of a boomer non sequitur given that the 2010 giro crop also did the 2013 giro, which had pretty extensive route changes and stage cancellations
 
Jul 25, 2012
12,967
1,970
25,680
I doubt it's ambiguous enough to include the unwillingness to ride the first 120 km today.
Neither of us could know what's been said, why and what options were rejected, so I'll just say it clearly could be and we can get on to the circular discussion part.
 
May 18, 2021
748
1,166
7,180
Just changed my entire day schedule for getting ready to the most antecipated stage of this Giro (personal opinion) tunned in to Eurosport and started seeing yesterday’s stage with no context whatsoever !! Then I came here to understand what’s going on and found that for safety reasons about Croix de Coeur descent the Giro shortened the stage by 120k just to start at the bottom of Croix de Coeur, so the dangerous descent will be done anyway! Someone please tell me that I’m wrong!!
 
Last edited:
Jul 18, 2009
16
3
8,535
Enjoying the posts from people saying “if this happened in XXXX we wouldn’t have seen a crazy doper do some crazy doper stuff”

And putting up Moscon up as a paragon of virtue? Ha ha
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brullnux