I’m curious to see not who people think *will* win but who they *want* to win.
Also, I think this is my first thread creation, so go easy on me.
Also, I think this is my first thread creation, so go easy on me.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
For me it’s the other way around. Pogacar, because I don’t like Jumbo.Vingegaard. Mainly because I despise the UAE team.
Hot goat summer!There was an option in the poll, and I just couldn't resist the temptation!
And I was not the only one.
If Vino never gave an interview, would that imply that he had no personality? I think racing behaviour matters more than public statements.Can't find it in me to root for the guy with zero personality outside of calling his wife approximately three seconds after each stage has finished, nor for the guy on the dirty oil money team who's too good at literally everything. As for the rest of the field, I might as well root for someone like Jakobsen because the difference between his winning chances and those of a Hindley is marginal. Of the actual climbers, Bernal, Træen and Pinot would be the feelgood stories.
Please point me to the place in my post where I say my views on personality are based solely on public statements.If Vino never gave an interview, would that imply that he had no personality? I think racing behaviour matters more than public statements.
I can't really recall any statements from Bernal in particular, my perception of his personality is almost entirely based on his racing and e.g. how he honoured the pink jersey in Cortina.
If you think he has zero personality outside of what he has said (of which talking about his family is the only thing that counts), then I think you either mean a particular kind of personality and not zero, or you just don't base it on his racing at all.Please point me to the place in my post where I say my views on personality are based solely on public statements.