#7: Superbagnères (Haute-Garonne)
The superignored
Let's head for the Pyrénées to discover another forgotten climb. We all know it's part of the two biggest mountains for the Tour de France and we can't really see a Tour without going through. Of course, it has its legends: Tourmalet, Aubisque, Peyresourde, and some nice finishes in stations like La Mongie (on Tourmalet's slopes), Plateau de Beille, Ax 3 Domaines, Hautacam... And today, we're going to get quite close to a stage finish in the Vuelta this year. Yeah Netserk and Eshnar, you guessed it right.
The Superbagnères winter sports station is located above the famous city of Bagnères-de-Luchon (or simply called Luchon), which hosted the Tour on 28 occasions since 1947. So yeah, that's a lot. But it's explained by the fact it has a central place in the Pyrénées, being at the doors of Spain, and is surround by very known passes: Peyresourde at the west, Balès at the north-west which was recently paved in 2007, Portillon at the east, and if we go a little bit farther north, we'll face the grueling Col de Menté which is one of the hardest 1st category climbs in France (9.3 km at 9.1 %). The city of Luchon is also part of the "Circle of Death" of the Pyrénées, composed of the Col de Peyresourde, Col d'Aspin, Col du Tourmalet and Col d'Aubisque, and comes to an end in Pau. The Tour kinda likes to do these climbs frequently.
But what's actually kinda surprising is since 1989, the Superbagnères climb hasn't been used, but the Tour actually stopped 5 times in Luchon. So why the Tour places its finish at the bottom of the valley, while they could add another hard climb and do a mountain top finish which is only mere kilometers away from Luchon? And the fact is the climb could be easily chained with any of the climbs surrounding the city. It could be either Peyresourde, Portillon, and the pavement of Balès, which is also HC, added even more value to the Superbagnères climb.
So why is it ignored by the Tour and other cycling races? Why the city of Luchon wants stage finishes in their city instead of their winter sports station? One thing's sure: it's not because the climb is too easy.
Top: 1800 m
Length: 16.4 km
Ascent: 1147 m
Average gradient: 7 %
Climbbybike Difficulty rating: 133
Let's just drop the first 2 kilometers that are flat to just take the real start of the climb. Being more than 16 kilometers long, it averages 7 % in gradient, but the climb is very irregular. After starting with some steep ramps, a false-flat part follows for a few kilometers. Then it comes back again to some steep ramps above 8 %. And after 4 kilometers of climbing (km 6 on the graph), the whole climb just goes up and flat over and over again, making it difficult to find a cruise speed and making shift gears frequent, but effectively giving some bits of rest in the flat parts. The final five kilometers are the hardest, averaging 8.5 %, that adds even more difficulty to an already demanding climb.
This climb has the whole package: being near a known city, has an irregular and a very demanding climb, could be chained with other demanding climbs for a very nice queen stage, and the architecture of the station is quite nice nonetheless. Much better than some recent stations that just have grey concrete buildings that actually ruin the scenery. So it might be a mystery: why this climb became, all of a sudden, unpopular? Is it because of money? Logistics? And even the Route du Sud doesn't want to climb it this year despite arriving, also, to Luchon. It's a bit of an injustice to see this climb completely ignored by the organizers. But maybe it's because the station just doesn't want it anymore and isn't candidate to host a stage finish in any race. Let's just hope they'll get some interest again in the future!
Yeah, the hint was easy. ^^