Lol at D-T stating last year that Amstel was hard because continuously up & down.
I tuned in with 67km to go. It was panflat !!
Between 67km to finish and 30k you barely have 3 Flanders-like climbs but without cobbles of course.
If this race finishes with a sprint, it is because it's way too soft, period. Only the final part is hard and every observer with more than two brain cells would understand that the part between 2/3rd and 3/4th of the route should be sharpened to make it hard and exciting. The former course to Maastricht with the Côte d'Hallembaye was definitely more interesting.
Amstel really has no charm for me. Already the name of the race being an extrasport sponsor (and, what's more, a bad beer), doesn't make it greater.
Amstel = Dustbin.