79th Gent-Wevelgem, 26th March 2017, 249 km, 1.UWT

Page 17 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Aug 16, 2013
7,620
2
0
Re: Re:

Gigs_98 said:
Arredondo said:
DFA123 said:
KGB said:
There is not any even little question mark Sagan beat Cancellara even in solo,period.You really can not compare GVA with Fabian.
I'm not comparing GVA with Cancellara. They are completely different riders. GVA is way more dangerous to Sagan, because he is the better sprinter at the end of hard races.

In any event, Cancellara lost RVV last year due to a tactical error in not following the decisive split. Impossible to say whether or not he was stronger or weaker than Sagan physically.

I think Cancellara was just as strong as Sagan physically. His ascent of the Paterberg was just as quick. But for sure, he couldn't have dropped him in the final. Which means Sagan most likely would have won anyway.
I'm really not sure if Cancellara would have lost a sprint against Sagan. One week before the Ronde Sagan lost a two men sprint against Kwiat by 4(!!!) seconds. It really depends on the rest of the race and if Sagan had needed to go fast on the last two kilometers.

Sure, but Sagan his strongest day in the spring was in Flanders. He rode like a beast that day.
 

KGB

Apr 16, 2015
480
0
0
Re:

Screecher said:
Quick-Step Floors should start marking GVA and not Sagan if they want to win anything. It doesn´t seem like it will work the other way around. Sagan is not prepared to close every gap because it lost him many races before, where as GVA can sprint just as well after a hard effort.
Yep someone said here''if Etixx will mark Sagan he will not win but either any Etixx rider.End of the day not that bad tactic error from Sagan today and specially in Nicky T. case.
 
Mar 13, 2015
2,637
0
0
Re:

glassmoon said:
LOL Sagan: it's just one example how he (Terpstra) can lose a race against me :)

No, it was example how to lose a race when you're in perfect position to win that race! Very stupid move from Sagan today.
 
Re: Re:

tukabel said:
Sagan teaching the whole peloton a lesson thay will pay him back massively long-term... maybe already in De Ronde
He certainly showed them...

Dekker_Tifosi said:
lol. "greg sprints better after a hard race then sagan"

well that's usually because Sagan has to do twice as much work. When he doesn't and tries to 'ride smarter', they get caught. It's the curse of having a greater sprint imho.
Fair to say that GVA was working harder in the group today.
In Omloop, Sagan did a lot of work at first, but no more or less the last 20 km. I think that the power GVA has left after a very hard race is still underestimated.
 
Mar 13, 2015
2,637
0
0
Re:

Dekker_Tifosi said:
By wanting to make Sagan lose, Terpstra made himself lose. What an imbecile. :D

You would say Van Avermaet wins this but Keukeleire is really fast too.

Quite opposite, I think "the imbecile" was Sagan! It was a perfect situation for him, 5 men group, GVA and Jens would work, Terpstra little less, but he couldn't go anywhere, and that young Sunweb guy would work alright after a few words from Sagan or GVA. So he wouldn't be spent at the finish and he would out sprint those guys easily. He wanted to prove a point, but he didn't proved anything, he just lost a race which he should've won quite easily!
 

KGB

Apr 16, 2015
480
0
0
Re: Re:

Gigs_98 said:
Arredondo said:
DFA123 said:
KGB said:
There is not any even little question mark Sagan beat Cancellara even in solo,period.You really can not compare GVA with Fabian.
I'm not comparing GVA with Cancellara. They are completely different riders. GVA is way more dangerous to Sagan, because he is the better sprinter at the end of hard races.

In any event, Cancellara lost RVV last year due to a tactical error in not following the decisive split. Impossible to say whether or not he was stronger or weaker than Sagan physically.

I think Cancellara was just as strong as Sagan physically. His ascent of the Paterberg was just as quick. But for sure, he couldn't have dropped him in the final. Which means Sagan most likely would have won anyway.
I'm really not sure if Cancellara would have lost a sprint against Sagan. One week before the Ronde Sagan lost a two men sprint against Kwiat by 4(!!!) seconds. It really depends on the rest of the race and if Sagan had needed to go fast on the last two kilometers.
No.Last year week before Ronde Sagan won sprint against Cancellara but I am sure that would be different sprint in Ronde if that happened.Anyway GVA was today super strong whole day.Sagan had moments when he struggle or just stayed in back of peloton.GVA is look in better form before Ronde then Sagan after today race.
 
Re: Re:

KGB said:
Gigs_98 said:
Arredondo said:
DFA123 said:
KGB said:
There is not any even little question mark Sagan beat Cancellara even in solo,period.You really can not compare GVA with Fabian.
I'm not comparing GVA with Cancellara. They are completely different riders. GVA is way more dangerous to Sagan, because he is the better sprinter at the end of hard races.

In any event, Cancellara lost RVV last year due to a tactical error in not following the decisive split. Impossible to say whether or not he was stronger or weaker than Sagan physically.

I think Cancellara was just as strong as Sagan physically. His ascent of the Paterberg was just as quick. But for sure, he couldn't have dropped him in the final. Which means Sagan most likely would have won anyway.
I'm really not sure if Cancellara would have lost a sprint against Sagan. One week before the Ronde Sagan lost a two men sprint against Kwiat by 4(!!!) seconds. It really depends on the rest of the race and if Sagan had needed to go fast on the last two kilometers.
No.Last year week before Ronde Sagan won sprint against Cancellara but I am sure that would be different sprint in Ronde if that happened.Anyway GVA was today super strong whole day.Sagan had moments when he struggle or just stayed in back of peloton.GVA is look in better form before Ronde then Sagan after today race.
Don´t forget that Sagan crashed 2 days ago and complained about back pain. Not saying it as an excuse, but still worth mentioning.
 
Oct 31, 2016
275
0
0
So Terpstra was willing to work with Kristoff in 2015 but not with Sagan in 2017 ? Very cheap ...
 
Re:

sQiD said:
So Terpstra was willing to work with Kristoff in 2015 but not with Sagan in 2017 ? Very cheap ...
I´m pretty sure the team orders were to make Sagan work as much as possible, but i don´t think they expected it work out that way and when they realized they made a mistake it was already too late.
 
Sagan is a marked man. He wouldn't be if he wasn't the best rider in the world, no disrespect to GVA and the rest. And he keeps finding himself in a pickle: damn if he does (MSR), damn if he doesn't (today). I can't blame Terpstra: he did what they all do...

Hats off to GVA: he took his responsibilities. What a year so far!
 
Pretty crazy how GVA can still generate so much power even after a hard race of 250 km. I wouldn't want to go to the finish with him if I were Sagan. He will need to drop him if he wants to win imo.

Kinda feel bad for Sagan tbh, this is the second race he could and perhaps should have won (especially MSR, really dumb how he lost that one) that he just threw away.
 
Jul 21, 2016
913
0
0
Tonton said:
Sagan is a marked man. He wouldn't be if he wasn't the best rider in the world, no disrespect to GVA and the rest. And he keeps finding himself in a pickle: damn if he does (MSR), damn if he doesn't (today). I can't blame Terpstra: he did what they all do...

Hats off to GVA: he took his responsibilities. What a year so far!

GVA has been a class act so far. Great win that was.
I had it in my head he was always a defensive rider, not an instigator. Is my memory playing tricks on me or has he become much more aggressive?
 
Dan2016 said:
Tonton said:
Sagan is a marked man. He wouldn't be if he wasn't the best rider in the world, no disrespect to GVA and the rest. And he keeps finding himself in a pickle: damn if he does (MSR), damn if he doesn't (today). I can't blame Terpstra: he did what they all do...

Hats off to GVA: he took his responsibilities. What a year so far!

GVA has been a class act so far. Great win that was.
I had it in my head he was always a defensive rider, not an instigator. Is my memory playing tricks on me or has he become much more aggressive?
GVA has always been an agressive rider. He's actually always been too agressive until last year or so.
 
well, sagan warned everybody, but mainly quicksteppers that he can decide who will win. In MSR, he decided it will be Kwiat, today, he decided it will be gva.

Now kidding aside, Sagan imho wouldn't have won against GvA today. As he seems never to do in these kind of finales. What he did today, was probably for Lefevre to realize, that GvA can't be let go. Sagan will probably drop everybody on Kwaaremont Paterberg duo, but he need's to get there in a way, when he can finish it alone, or without GvA, unless they have 1 min gap on Paterberg on the chasers, and even then I would favor GvA.

We'll see, but it should be a great spectacle on Sunday. I am glad GvA returned to the game as cycling fan, as Sagan's a little bet less. Let the best of those two win. If they splitted ToF and PR with PR to Sagan, I wouldn't care.
 
Great race, great winner. I like GVA a lot more when he wins like this instead when he tries to wheelsuck his way to a win. To be fair the wheelsucking only happens when he goes head to head vs Sagan. Anyway he is having a fantastic start of the classics campaign. Can't wait for RVV.

I see the notion that GVA is a stronger sprinter than Sagan after a hard race is still going strong in here. As some posters have already noted, Sagan is usually the rider who spends a lot more energy before the final sprint. Also think of how many times have you seen Sagan saving energy in the last few kms in groups of two, three, four, five riders (maybe just a few times in his career) and how many times have you seen leading him out in these circumstances (almost every time). Now think of how many times have you seen GVA leading out for a sprint a group of 2, 3, 4 riders in the last kms. Of course I'm talking only about the situations when both GVA and Sagan were in a small group contesting the victory. I honestly can't think of a race where GVA was in front of Sagan when they were approaching the sprint in the last km of a race. GVA always makes sure Sagan is the one leading out. He is right, you say, Sagan is the better sprinter. I agree. But imagine if the roles were reversed and somehow Sagan finds himself behind GVA in those situations. I think Sagan wins 9/10.

GVA is a fantastic rider, a beast and a master tactician in the end of these type of races. But please stop with the Sagan can't sprint after a hard race nonsense. You can say Sagan's sprint after a hard race is more affected in comparison to his sprint after a TdF flat stage than GVA's sprint is. That would be true.

Having said that today the strongest rider won. Hats off to GVA. Today he was the one doing the most work and he did the lead out in the last km. Although it was against Keukelere (great ride by him btw) who doesn't have much experience in this kind of situations, he timed his sprint perfectly and took a convincing win. Again I can't wait for RVV :D
 
Jul 21, 2016
913
0
0
Red Rick said:
Dan2016 said:
Tonton said:
Sagan is a marked man. He wouldn't be if he wasn't the best rider in the world, no disrespect to GVA and the rest. And he keeps finding himself in a pickle: damn if he does (MSR), damn if he doesn't (today). I can't blame Terpstra: he did what they all do...

Hats off to GVA: he took his responsibilities. What a year so far!

GVA has been a class act so far. Great win that was.
I had it in my head he was always a defensive rider, not an instigator. Is my memory playing tricks on me or has he become much more aggressive?
GVA has always been an agressive rider. He's actually always been too agressive until last year or so.

Good stuff. I like the instigators. Really enjoyed his racing this season.
I'd put money on him for Flanders now.

(I'm easily confused, don't know why I thought he was normally defensive)
 

Latest posts