Christian said:
			
		
	
	
		
		
			As you rightly say Gilbert would have made it anyway, he was sitting down on the Roche aux Faucons, didn't even have to go en danseuse. There was no one whose wheel Fränk could have followed to get back at the two because no one else had the strength to be up there. That was the winning move and everyone knew it, so better be in it.
		
		
	 
Correct - there was only one wheel Fränk could have followed - Gilbert's.
Gilbert didn't go instantly when Andy did. Fränk went across and Gilbert went with him. If Fränk hadn't gone across, Gilbert would have gone across anyway, Fränk could have followed his wheel, and then you have a slightly more tired Gilbert and a slightly less tired Fränk. Maybe that little amount could have been what made the difference between a Fränk that could only follow and watch Gilbert disappear and a Fränk that could put in an attack and try to pressurise Gilbert.
It would probably have failed anyway, but the whole debate would have been nullified because the Schlecks would have tried to shake Gilbert but failed. As it was, it just looked like they were content to fill out the podium and let Gilbert have his moment in the sun. That they didn't win isn't what annoyed people. That they didn't have the strength to win isn't what annoyed people. That they rolled over and accepted it without a fight is what annoyed people.
You could argue that the 240km before that was what the fight was. But we didn't see any fighting in that 240km - we just saw a péloton riding together. So when it came to the business end nobody had the strength to do anything, and it looked like they were just letting it happen. That left a sour taste in the mouth.