However, many in cycling believe doping was widespread in the early 2000s. How does anyone know Landis is lying?
"That's the problem," Millar said. "Now he's lost the ability to tell the truth whether it is or not. That's what's despicable about it - and sad. Because I'm sure there's truth in some of it. But it doesn't mean anything anymore."
Whoops, guess you were wrong about it 'not meaning anything', eh Davey boy?
Despite trying to keep an open mind about Millar, it's the quotes about Landis that I find most disturbing. Why take cheap shots about his failed marriage and alcoholism? What the hell? The guy was telling the truth about something serious, regardless of how 'backed into a corner' he was (hypocritical much, David?) Seriously, Millar was caught red-handed out of competition and confessed when he was backed into a corner, Landis was caught in-competition for something that even now he claims to be false, stood to lose the biggest prize in cycling if he confessed, etc. I can understand why the guy denied. Regardless, Millar's hypocrisy seems to be at odds with even his own team's stated encouragement of truth whenever, however.
I wonder what he said to his teammates Christian Vande Velde, Tom Danielson and Dave Z, oh and his boss/co-owner Vaughters when they 'could have spoken up years ago' but only did when they were 'backed into a corner' by a grand jury.
Seriously disappointing, Millar.