Re: Re:
That post really reminds me of a poster on here, who has been posting a bit after a break of several years, most of their posts are troll posts about Contador going for a place between 5 and 10 at the Tour.
Would not be surprised if it's the same person
At 22 years!bob.a.feet said:Literally only finished outside the top 5 onceCance > TheRest said:I could not help but notice this ridiculous post in the CN comments section
"I like the idea of Contador riding the Giro but it depends upon the level of competition. If the level is as high as this year he is better off riding a race he can be competitive in like the Tour of California.
Regardless, he should focus on the Vuelta. While Contador has never been able to compete with the top echelon of riders when they are in top form he has shown the ability to keep a high level of riding all year. Subsequently, he has made a career out of riding against weaker, tired and out of form riders in the Vuelta. This should still be his focus rather than his annual crusade hoping to get a top 7 to 15 placement at the Tour. Mollema has fulfilled that role the last 8 years much better than Contador as Mollema has actually been relevant in the race. Trek should focus on Mollema and Pantano."
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/dauphine-guercilena-keen-to-keep-contador-as-he-builds-for-2018/
One of the funniest comments I've read in a while.
That post really reminds me of a poster on here, who has been posting a bit after a break of several years, most of their posts are troll posts about Contador going for a place between 5 and 10 at the Tour.
Would not be surprised if it's the same person