Hm i don't know. It's definitely out of his character. But I won't read it too much on that. He is a racer with heart of a champion. So, he won't show up just to lay down and play dead to Froome. So we probably are the one who has too high of a hope for him, and expecting good means he'll destroy his opponents.
If you take a look Contador preban and post band, the changes that happens on him is interesting. I'm not talking about his strength, but more about him as a person. Before the ban, in my opinion, he was more insecure, more inclusive to his spanish circles, he also projected more about himself, judging from his pistol icon showed up on his team bike. Why is this matter. If i can recall, none of the GT winner or champions has their icon on their team material. Riders usually get a stripe of colors for winning GT, or world champion, but the least they got their "nickname". Anyway, that's why i thought it has some significance on how he branded himself within his team.
Fast forward, post ban, I saw him a lot more mature, a lot more confidence, a lot more relax, a lot more open in my opinion compare to before. From his interview, during the race, he shows more and more about his team mate (maybe before he did too, we just never see it publicly. Thanks to twitter I guess) and more about his team. Last vuelta, if I'm not mistaken, I didn't see any pistol icon on his bike anymore, and so far this year too. I might be wrong, but my point is, to me this is a sign that he is less about branding himself within his team, and he shows more publicly that he is part of the team and it's all about the team. Or maybe Bjarne played role on that, I don't know. (but i can't be 100% about the pistol icon on the bike, we'll see if the icon ends up still on the bike). If it does, then this point is false . But i just thought it's always interesting when a team sport that's supposed to be all about team, has a rider brand himself differently than the rest of the team. Not that it's anything wrong, it just kinda defeat the purpose of 'team' idea, you know… there's no "i" on the 'team'? (Projected outside of the team is fine, but not inside the team.)..okay back to my rumbling opinion..
One thing that's strike the most is from one of his coming back interview (might be in youtube), he mentioned that his perpective about his life in cycling isn't about 'all about cycling anymore'. He said, that cycling is only part of life and there's a lot more other than cycling. This to me, is kind of a glimpse of his look on how he sees his career moving forward and how he wants to take it from now on. Certainly, it sounded more a mature look to me.His trouble has definitely shaped his thinking and his look on his life in cycling and in general. One thing that doesn't change is that he still loves to compete and win. (And we still witness that to this day). Maybe this time around, he won't win it with his sure brute of strength and dominating performance plus his signature's sting attack, but maybe with a combination of strength and more calculated, strategic and smart move. Contador might not be the strongest guy in La Vuelta, but he did won it, because he was smarter and he outwitted his opponent.
So yes, we've seen him this year and our head was full with his replay of his dominating past performance and understandably, we expected that he'll decimate the field like years before. Just to our disappointment, he did none of it. Then we started to say he sucks, he would be beaten by Froome, and endless of thought and doubts start to take center of our discussion whenever we mention about him. But we must not forget, in 6 months of his absence, cycling has changed a lot. The technology changes as well as his opponent. New breed of challenger arises and new approches in science has emerged. Every race we found new revelations. But a great champion always manages to adapt.
So this is a Contador v.2.0. He might not be dominating as in the past. But he is surely be up there to challenge Froome. Every champion always has his nemesis. He might not be winning with his style like in the past, but maybe he'll win it with sheer wit, smart and strategic move combine with his signature attacking style. After all, a great champion always adapts. Winning might not be come as easy as it used to be for him, but we would be surely treated with a great race. He is a real racer, and he 'makes' the race exciting.
And finally, this is just some personal observation from some one who's not even a psychologist
If you take a look Contador preban and post band, the changes that happens on him is interesting. I'm not talking about his strength, but more about him as a person. Before the ban, in my opinion, he was more insecure, more inclusive to his spanish circles, he also projected more about himself, judging from his pistol icon showed up on his team bike. Why is this matter. If i can recall, none of the GT winner or champions has their icon on their team material. Riders usually get a stripe of colors for winning GT, or world champion, but the least they got their "nickname". Anyway, that's why i thought it has some significance on how he branded himself within his team.
Fast forward, post ban, I saw him a lot more mature, a lot more confidence, a lot more relax, a lot more open in my opinion compare to before. From his interview, during the race, he shows more and more about his team mate (maybe before he did too, we just never see it publicly. Thanks to twitter I guess) and more about his team. Last vuelta, if I'm not mistaken, I didn't see any pistol icon on his bike anymore, and so far this year too. I might be wrong, but my point is, to me this is a sign that he is less about branding himself within his team, and he shows more publicly that he is part of the team and it's all about the team. Or maybe Bjarne played role on that, I don't know. (but i can't be 100% about the pistol icon on the bike, we'll see if the icon ends up still on the bike). If it does, then this point is false . But i just thought it's always interesting when a team sport that's supposed to be all about team, has a rider brand himself differently than the rest of the team. Not that it's anything wrong, it just kinda defeat the purpose of 'team' idea, you know… there's no "i" on the 'team'? (Projected outside of the team is fine, but not inside the team.)..okay back to my rumbling opinion..
One thing that's strike the most is from one of his coming back interview (might be in youtube), he mentioned that his perpective about his life in cycling isn't about 'all about cycling anymore'. He said, that cycling is only part of life and there's a lot more other than cycling. This to me, is kind of a glimpse of his look on how he sees his career moving forward and how he wants to take it from now on. Certainly, it sounded more a mature look to me.His trouble has definitely shaped his thinking and his look on his life in cycling and in general. One thing that doesn't change is that he still loves to compete and win. (And we still witness that to this day). Maybe this time around, he won't win it with his sure brute of strength and dominating performance plus his signature's sting attack, but maybe with a combination of strength and more calculated, strategic and smart move. Contador might not be the strongest guy in La Vuelta, but he did won it, because he was smarter and he outwitted his opponent.
So yes, we've seen him this year and our head was full with his replay of his dominating past performance and understandably, we expected that he'll decimate the field like years before. Just to our disappointment, he did none of it. Then we started to say he sucks, he would be beaten by Froome, and endless of thought and doubts start to take center of our discussion whenever we mention about him. But we must not forget, in 6 months of his absence, cycling has changed a lot. The technology changes as well as his opponent. New breed of challenger arises and new approches in science has emerged. Every race we found new revelations. But a great champion always manages to adapt.
So this is a Contador v.2.0. He might not be dominating as in the past. But he is surely be up there to challenge Froome. Every champion always has his nemesis. He might not be winning with his style like in the past, but maybe he'll win it with sheer wit, smart and strategic move combine with his signature attacking style. After all, a great champion always adapts. Winning might not be come as easy as it used to be for him, but we would be surely treated with a great race. He is a real racer, and he 'makes' the race exciting.
And finally, this is just some personal observation from some one who's not even a psychologist