airstream
BANNED
Netserk said:It was your words. Not mine.
The things is you rephrase my words with the sense you want in the situation which doesn't relate to the future.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Netserk said:It was your words. Not mine.
Did I mention the future?airstream said:The things is you rephrase my words with the sense you want in the situation which doesn't relate to the future.
airstream said:Yes, it was implied I think
airstream said:Is it quintessence his strength like a stage racer or evaluation criterion for the Tour?
What's more importand, final spot or gap?
Angliru said:The gap is an indication of where you stood in respect to the winner and those that finished ahead of you. Froome disappeared from view in the final week whether fat because he just gave up and coasted in or just succumbed to his fatigue. Contador continued to battle till the end. As much as you want to deny it you wouldn't allow yourself to give the rider that you despise credit over the current one who you support so this dialogue isn't going to go anywhere.
It showed that Contador has better recovery than Froome.airstream said:I never disagreed with the fact that Contador did his GT combo better, but I don't see what about it can say in terms of coming Tour. The Vuelta simply showed that rider Contador was prepared significantly better compared to his reachable peak than rider Froome compared to his peak. The Vuelta didn't say that GC racer Contador is stronger than GC rider Froome in general. This question can get an answer only in the Tour. Vuelta was just one time GT chapter.
Netserk said:It showed that Contador has better recovery than Froome.
airstream said:I never disagreed with the fact that Contador did his GT combo better, but I don't see what about it can say in terms of coming Tour. The Vuelta simply showed that rider Contador was prepared significantly better compared to his reachable peak than rider Froome compared to his peak. The Vuelta didn't say that GC racer Contador is stronger than GC rider Froome in general. This question can get an answer only in the Tour. Vuelta was just one time GT chapter.
ferryman said:Oh please give it a break. I'm not sure you even believe yourself anymore. Go back to pretending to support my boy Schleck, at least then you weren't constantly spouting this anti-Contador nonsense. Dial it back.
airstream said:Someone simply takes 2 abstract years [with million of different circumstances in them] of experienced GC rider Contador and rider Froome, who learnt how to rider big races by leaps and bounds, tries to compare them, makes an univocal conclusion on such initially debatable question and serves it like the ultimate truth. Do you find it normal? Alright.
Netserk said:It showed that Contador has better recovery than Froome.
Taxus4a said:I dont think so.
At least the Contador after sanction
Contador finished La Vuelta losing time with Valverde, that rode TdF.
He has more recovery than endurance, but anyway I think his recovery is overestimated.
airstream said:I never disagreed with the fact that Contador did his GT combo better, but I don't see what about it can say in terms of coming Tour. The Vuelta simply showed that rider Contador was prepared significantly better compared to his reachable peak than rider Froome compared to his peak. The Vuelta didn't say that GC racer Contador is stronger than GC rider Froome in general. This question can get an answer only in the Tour. Vuelta was just one time GT chapter.
nick101 said:I don't think the tour will be a true representation of contador vs froome. Contador doesn't have form as far as we all know, whereas froome does. Everybody agrees that the 2012 Vuelta wasn't a true representation of contador vs froome or froomes abilites right?? Same situation here, except contador is in the same position as froome was at the vuelta. No one says contador was better than froome because he won when froome was unfit, so why say that about froome winning the tour?? doesn't make sense to me and stinks of a blind hatred of all things contador. For me that's like comparing two cars who have equal power etc but then supplying one with low quality petrol and one with high quality petrol, then declaring the one with better petrol the best when both actually are equal. That doesn't actually make either car better, it makes a biased criteria. Same situation here. When both are on form then it'll be a true battle of their actual abilities - not when one is unfit and one is fit. Whether that will happen is unlikely at this stage for me.
karlboss said:People say Vuelta wasn't fair as Froome designed his season around the Tour and then tried to hold form through the vuelta whereas Contador aimed the whole year at the vuelta.
This year they've both aimed at the Tour.
nick101 said:That doesn't really matter. The point was froome wasn't at his best at the vuelta and clearly contador isn't either this year for the tour. Froome wasn't on form for the vuelta so people said that's why contador won, same situation for the tour imo.
Contador couldn't really aim for the vuelta as he had limited race preparation due to his ban, so aiming his whole season at the vuelta seems irrelevant also as he didn't really have one.
Froome didn't really design his whole season around the tour either, he was domestique for wiggins and not team leader, so getting second at the tour was a great result given he used so much energy to help wiggins
Siriuscat said:How do you figure that out?? Another crystal ball specialist!!
It doesn't start till Saturday. He'll be ready, whether it's ready enough we'll see over the next few weeks
R0BL4MBT0N said:I note the same bickering going on for pages and pages. Too lazy to scroll though... anyone have any info on the Spanish champs?
Did Contador ride? I know he didn't podium either RR or TT but that's it...
nick101 said:I don't think the tour will be a true representation of contador vs froome. Contador doesn't have form as far as we all know, whereas froome does. Everybody agrees that the 2012 Vuelta wasn't a true representation of contador vs froome or froomes abilites right?? Same situation here, except contador is in the same position as froome was at the vuelta. No one says contador was better than froome because he won when froome was unfit, so why say that about froome winning the tour?? doesn't make sense to me and stinks of a blind hatred of all things contador. For me that's like comparing two cars who have equal power etc but then supplying one with low quality petrol and one with high quality petrol, then declaring the one with better petrol the best when both actually are equal. That doesn't actually make either car better, it makes a biased criteria. Same situation here. When both are on form then it'll be a true battle of their actual abilities - not when one is unfit and one is fit. Whether that will happen is unlikely at this stage for me.