[/quote]Very nice post Hitch.
I think what hurts the most is that as the narrative in our minds (and probably his as well) that he has unfinished business at the Tour de France, the one race which is regarded as the highest he could achieve. From being booed in 2011 to now, 6 years later, the biggest race in the world has caused him and his fans sparsely good memories. The fact that he was so bad in 2013, and Sky coming down on the race has made people talk like Alberto Contador was a relic of a bygone era. Even in his greatest season since his comeback, he did not get a chance to fight for the win, and I think that's what hurts the most. He didn't even get the chance to fight for the win, be it missing peaks, be it crashing, be it Giro's, he's always underperformed compared to what he can actually do. Even now, people seem to assume that today showcased his true level. I don't believe that. Being outclimbed by a guy with a single Vuelta top 10 to his name, who fractured his pelvis 2 months ago and who's been in the breakaway 2 days in a row isn't what he can do. And he's not been able to show what he can do at the biggest stage for 6 years now.
For me personally, it's been similar to watching my favorite tennis player, Andy Roddick, chase his 2nd Grand Slam victory for years. The 2014 Tour crash had a 09' Wimbledon feel to it.[/quote]
Its funny that you write that because Roddick was also my favourite tennis player and the 2009 Wimbledon final a very harsh one to watch. My heart always drops when I see highlights of it. And Roddick had that easy volley that would have won that 2nd set. Morally it would have been 100x better for Roddick to get 1 than fed to get another one.
But I always force myself to watch it, to relive the pain, and remind myself that Roddick's story or Contador's story is not my story.
And hey Roddick's got a supermodel wife. Not that that neccesarily leads to happiness ultimately, but it certainly puts into perspective how pathetic it is to feel sorry for him. He's got tv gigs, retired early, won't have to work any job he doesn't want, his kids futures are set. Is that who I should be feeling sorry for? Considering there's 24 million people living as slaves in North Korea currently, millions of others around the world living other forms of suffering. Its just a trick of the brain that we identify with characters we see on tv.
Contador hasn't got it that bad. He's also set financially, and this being born into what I understand is more of a poorer neighbourhood in Pinto. He's financially set, got a loving wife (or I remember it that way), he survived the brain scare, he can help his unfortunate brother (which in some ways is more important than a million TDF's). And heck, he tasted 3 times the glory of winning the Tour de France. One of them he got from Rasmussen who doesn't even have that consolation. But Rasmussen seems like a happy man as well.
Winning TDF's can also be a curse. Floyd's life probably would have been way better if he had never got there, Armstrong probably in a similar boat. Pantani paid in a different way. Fignon died young too as did Anquetil. Compare the latter to his rival Poulidor. 50 years ago we would have been sorry for Poulidor in favour of Fignon. But who of them has been living by all accounts a very nice life as an icon for 40 years since. I think people like Pereiro and Sastre who can win a Tour quietly and then retire have it best of all.[/quote]
Yes, Roddick should have won Wimbledon, but yeah, the points you make, and well, I saw him interviewed extensively fairly recently, and he seems really happy. Wouldn't surprise me if he was happier than Sampras, Agassi, etc.
Roddick wasn't my favourite player, but I liked how he always seemed so honest, to the extent of even losing his temper semi-often (this is actually also why I currently love Daria Gavrilova....okay, I also think she is very cute; but there is a genuineness that comes out in her personality, and a real joy for life in some moments too) on the court. Perhaps emotions got the better of him at times, and if he was a little more robotic, maybe a little more Federer like in that way, then he would have won Wimbledon, and maybe more than once. But would have you liked him more if he had? Probably not. And would he have liked himself more? Maybe then, yes. Now? Probably not.
For me it has always been easier to identify with or attach myself to, sportspeople who have downs as well as ups (some more obvious than others....Contador has obviously had a HUGE amount of success). I am a bigger fan of Scottie Pippen than Michael Jordan. And yes, I still watch that Game 7 of the Western Conference finals for Portland against the Lakers. A lot of people say that Pippen needed an NBA championship without Jordan....and he probably did.
But the way that he and the Blazers went down in flames in that fourth quarter; that was just so Pippen. Not that Contador going down on Mont Du Chat was so Contador....I don't think this is at all defining for Alberto.
I don't think it is. Though unfortunately it is probably defining to some others.
Also, as has been said, this is their life. And we have ours. We don't - or we shouldn't - live our lives through our sports heroes. But it can be a nice - and a positive - distraction; one that I would have talked down inside myself during some periods of my life, as being pretty much a pointless exercise. But as long as you still have balance in life, then taking a large interest in some sports stars, particularly those who animate their art as much as Alberto, isn't such a bad way to be.