Is that with or without the starting handicap from stage 1?Gigs_98 said:From the Dumoulin thread:
The pyrenees didn't cost him the tour though. And even if he didn't crash, judging from shape in the alps, he would not have been able to gain a lot of time in the pyrenees anyway. All things considered and assuming that he maybe would have been a little bit better in the alps as well if the crashes hadn't happened, I think he could have been quite close to Evans, but I doubt he could have beaten him.Netserk said:My understanding is that while his crashes didn't (particularly) injure him, they did drain him and in large part (together with restday magic™) explain why he was worse in the Pyrenees than he was overall in the third week.Gigs_98 said:Just like froome next year. Actually froome even goes for 4 in a row.Leinster said:Multiple crashes in 2015 too, and a team half set up to win the green jersey.
And Contador in 2015 was going for holding all 3 at once
About contador's 2011 crashes, I'm still not sure whether the crashes really had such a big impact on his performance. As someone has already mentioned he had some really good days which I think are unlikely to have if you are injured. That sounds more like he had bad days which happen when you are tired due to a 2nd gt in a row.
But anyway, yes it would of course not be a given that even if things went smoothly that he would have done the double, but I very much think he had the form and freshness sufficient at the opening of the race that he had a proper chance of it.