Why would she change her loyalty? Everyone who knows just a little bit about science knows that this test proves nothing. Contador is saved by the fact that he was tested the day before the positive, on which date the amount of clenbuterol was zero. That means that the low amount cannot be justified by the substance's half-life. Moreover, there's just no possible way in which he can knowingly have consumed that low amount of clenbuterol, unless he willingly took 1/5000 of a normal clenbuterol doze (you can just imagine how small that "pill" would be - it wouldn't be visible to the naked eye, at least).sniper said:your loyalty to the guy is admirable.
he fooled you as much as anybody else.
There are only 2 options: either the clenbuterol got there by blood doping (which is not proved) or it got there by food contamination (not proved either). As I see it, he's not guilty unless they can actually prove that he blood doped. As it stands now he's suspended on a formality, namely the rule that says that a rider is responsible for having a banned substance in their body and have to prove themselves that it was due to contamination - which is impossible in Contador's case.