I suppose taking away his 2011 results would be fine if he still got a proper 2-year ban afterwards. With this system in place, what happens if someone who didn't win anything of note but who is otherwise in the same situation as Contador is suspended? You can take away his one-year and a half of nonexistent results, I guess. It might be fair to take them away in that he shouldn't have been riding, but not at the expense of shortening his actual suspension. And since taking away those results on top of an actual 2-year ban would translate into a 3-year ban, I'd be all for him keeping those results if it hasn't been established that he doped to get them.ChrisE said:You make no sense. If you support a two year ban from his AAF in 2010, how can you not take away in 2011 results?
Now you're just being silly.LaFlorecita said:There shouldn't be a ban at all!
LaFlorecita said:What makes you think I am not?
LaFlorecita said:And I've arranged plane tickets to Tanzania for the 25th...![]()
auscyclefan94 said:This thing of ours (as Hitch loves to call it) is screwed up but I still love the sport.
meat puppet said:Actually this is strictly by the books and IMO there really should be no complains about that. Alberto transgressed the rules and thus is justly punished. Even if the persons and institutions enforcing the rules be bogus, that's what they play by.
It's the benefactors and implications - ie lance clan reigns supreme - that annoy me. Double whammy.
webvan said:They should take away all his results and start the 2 year ban now since he never stopped racing.
hrotha said:I suppose taking away his 2011 results would be fine if he still got a proper 2-year ban afterwards. With this system in place, what happens if someone who didn't win anything of note but who is otherwise in the same situation as Contador is suspended? You can take away his one-year and a half of nonexistent results, I guess. It might be fair to take them away in that he shouldn't have been riding, but not at the expense of shortening his actual suspension. And since taking away those results on top of an actual 2-year ban would translate into a 3-year ban, I'd be all for him keeping those results if it hasn't been established that he doped to get them.
.
Susan Westemeyer said:
Snilla said:He is such a sweet and humble guy, a real gentleman. His world must be shattered at the moment. I feel truly sorry for him.![]()
Is that you flicker or POlish?Old&slow said:The good news is Contador is retiring. At least he said he would retire if he was found guilty. We know what a man of his word he is and how honest he is. Oh wait never mind I guess he won't retire. To bad it would be a much mroe exciting sport without him.
McLovin said:@LaFlorecita, put yourself together, stop cryin' and stop writing bull$h!t.
Snilla said:He is such a sweet and humble guy, a real gentleman. His world must be shattered at the moment. I feel truly sorry for him.![]()
Dutchsmurf said:So both the meat and the transfusion were listed as unlikely, so instead they went for a contaminated food supplement? So basically they say "it was something you ate, but not the meat". How does that make any sense?
Susan Westemeyer said:They said it was most likely a contaminated food supplement.
However, the onus is on the defendant to prove how it entered his body and he was unable to prove that to their satsification, hence the ban.
Susan
ChrisE said:If you were clean you wouldn't be embarrassed.
ChrisE said:Between you and this Florecita guy I need a barf bag.