Yep, the Amstel Gold is a race where the climbs in and of themselves aren't challenging enough to be selective in and of themselves, it's the accumulation of them, and so a periodic refresh of the route is more important here than, say, Flèche where everybody knows it's all about Huy anyway. If the route stays the same too many years, then people learn how to race each route and the racing becomes stale. Flèche, for what it's worth, is stale, but because of the prestige of winning atop the Mur and people not wanting to waste too much energy mid-week ahead of Liège, it seems to do fine for what it is.2017-2019 was much, much better than 2010-2012. Bemelerberg as the last climb is the best thing to ever happen to the race. I will not tolerate this crazy slander of a perfectly fine climb for its purpose. I hereby declare myself a Bemelerberg supremacist.
We've had no more than 4 riders sprint for the win without Cauberg as the last climb. Unlike the Cauberg years.
When they first moved the route to remove the final Cauberg it was a good shift, but the race has become somewhat less of a "hilly" classic as a result, less attached to the Ardennes classics, and I think the organisers wanted to restore some of that status. You say that we had no more than 4 riders sprint for the win, but group 2 was close enough last year to get the same time. Bemelerberg is much better as the last climb of the men's route than it is as part of the pathetic circuit on the women's race, but it still absolutely sucks as a climb, serving only to artificially add an arbitrary number to the amount of climbs in the race, kind of like when they give KOM points in GT starts in the Netherlands, as opposed to a real climb that could be meaningfully selective like Eyserbosweg, Keutenberg or Kruisberg, and I miss the days of climbs other than Cauberg being relevant.
The 2012 Worlds lengthening that circuit around Valkenburg was an absolute travesty for the race, moving potentially selective climbs further from the finish and rendering only Cauberg relevant, hence the need to revamp the course in 2017. If they wanted to shake things up to make it more of a hilly race again, then the 2012 Worlds circuit needs to go, like, completely. All they're doing here is going back to the worst version of the earlier courses rather than actually "fixing" anything.
And the women's race route is just a travesty. No amount of positives you can draw about the men's route since moving the finish will ever make up for it. They paradoxically probably worked really hard to figure out what the absolute laziest thing they could do was, and then they did it... and then actively made it worse by pointlessly extending the course on the last lap only to make it even harder to make anything but the last ascent of the Cauberg relevant.
Last edited: