MarkvW said:That argument would convince a reasonable person.
Unfortunately for him we clinic dwellers are anything but reasonable.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
MarkvW said:That argument would convince a reasonable person.
MarkvW said:That argument would convince a reasonable person.
Race Radio said:There is zero evidence of blood doping in GT's in the 80's. Let us know if you find any
86TDFWinner said:That's just it, he can't. He's been asked over a dozen times to provide info on anything he's claimed & he has yet to do so. He's also been asked atleast 5 times(now 6) to please post the info on Hinault doping(when/where/by whom) & also his info when he was supposedly a pro rider on tour. He's alluded to it, but has yet to post anything at all on it.
Like you(& MANY OTHERS) have said: he's got nothing.
Albatros said:I can even change the question. Why is it that it took 30 years to doping doctors to realise that blood doping could work in cycling too, when work by Conconi and others had proven that it was an important boost in endurance sports and moreover, undetectable.
Albatros said:Hinault didn't want to pass an antidoping test. Hinault defended the use of fortifiers (euphemistic term for doping). He is old school, he tells you he doped without saying so.
Or do you need him to win clean to give credibility to your boy? Sorry, your boy is on the same page as the rest. The difference is that your boy is an attention ***** who can not come to terms that he cheated like the rest.
Albatros said:I have asked you fanboys to provide a single reason for not blood doping in the 80's . Just one. Of course nobody comes with any.
You don't need to have evidence to know certain things are happening. They are just logically happening.
I can even change the question. Why is it that it took 30 years to doping doctors to realise that blood doping could work in cycling too, when work by Conconi and others had proven that it was an important boost in endurance sports and moreover, undetectable.
Albatros said:Hinault didn't want to pass an antidoping test. Hinault defended the use of fortifiers (euphemistic term for doping). He is old school, he tells you he doped without saying so.
Or do you need him to win clean to give credibility to your boy? Sorry, your boy is on the same page as the rest. The difference is that your boy is an attention ***** who can not come to terms that he cheated like the rest.
MarkvW said:Are you now abandoning your blood doping theory?
86TDFWinner said:I believe he is.....his M.O. is to just babble on about stuff he has no more knowledge of than amyone else here.
autologous said:And how is this any different to what you do here?
runninboy said:As was mentioned the technology available at the time in the 1980's to facilitate blood doping was pretty much nonexistent. Think about this as it puts it all in perspective at least to me. Greg Lemond mentioned once about how they used to sleep in the hallways on hot nights as alot of the hotels in the Tour did not even have air conditioning.
Now in hindsight someone believes that although riders were suffering with a lack of air conditioning , that somehow they magically had the capability to properly refrigerate blood.
Even today those little dorm room refrigerators you find in hotels would not be able to store blood as they have too large of temperature swing. I know this from personal experience with insulin.
However we are supposed to believe that hotels that did not even have air at the time would magically have medical grade refrigerators in each room.
Or maybe the teams carried their own from hotel to hotel with a really long extension cord.
that must be it!
silverrocket said:The USA cycling team in 1984 was poorly funded, yet was still able to blood dope at the 1984 Olympics.
silverrocket said:Also, at least 2-3 recent rider/mechanic testimonies seem to indicate that "medical grade" refrigerators are not necessary to keep blood cool. Didn't Armstrong require someone to be checking to make sure the power didn't go out and the blood in his fridge spoil?
silverrocket said:This again suggests Lemond certainly could have cheated his way to TdF victory, but there is still, apparently, no evidence that he actually did.
Grandillusion said:Wiggo, silverrockets points were perfectly valid, you're getting overheated.
He ended by saying there is still, after all these years, no evidence that he did cheat in such a way.
131313 said:Yeah, I do. LeMond actually strikes me as pretty naive in many ways, whether it's believing that Hinault would work for him or that Landis was clean (which he believed for a week until the positive test came out), he actually seems more optimistic than your average clinic poster. It seems to be a pretty clear pattern. So, I could see him buying the whole "lost weight/renewed focus" nonsense.
And since Dr. Coggan answered your question, it would appear that he learned of LA's vo2 numbers right before he won his 3rd tour...
So yeah, I'm basing my opinion on that information. You've really never answered my question though?
Ok even though Wiggo addressed this i want to chime insilverrocket said:The USA cycling team in 1984 was poorly funded, yet was still able to blood dope at the 1984 Olympics.
Also, at least 2-3 recent rider/mechanic testimonies seem to indicate that "medical grade" refrigerators are not necessary to keep blood cool. Didn't Armstrong require someone to be checking to make sure the power didn't go out and the blood in his fridge spoil?