Unfortunately for him we clinic dwellers are anything but reasonable.MarkvW said:That argument would convince a reasonable person.
Unfortunately for him we clinic dwellers are anything but reasonable.MarkvW said:That argument would convince a reasonable person.
i.e. The evolution of Omerta.MarkvW said:That argument would convince a reasonable person.
That's just it, he can't. He's been asked over a dozen times to provide info on anything he's claimed & he has yet to do so. He's also been asked atleast 5 times(now 6) to please post the info on Hinault doping(when/where/by whom) & also his info when he was supposedly a pro rider on tour. He's alluded to it, but has yet to post anything at all on it.Race Radio said:There is zero evidence of blood doping in GT's in the 80's. Let us know if you find any
Hinault didn't want to pass an antidoping test. Hinault defended the use of fortifiers (euphemistic term for doping). He is old school, he tells you he doped without saying so.86TDFWinner said:That's just it, he can't. He's been asked over a dozen times to provide info on anything he's claimed & he has yet to do so. He's also been asked atleast 5 times(now 6) to please post the info on Hinault doping(when/where/by whom) & also his info when he was supposedly a pro rider on tour. He's alluded to it, but has yet to post anything at all on it.
Like you(& MANY OTHERS) have said: he's got nothing.
Did Conconi use blood doping in any multi-stage races? Or were they all for single day or indoor velodrome (Moser's hour) efforts? Doping up with blood the morning or afternoon of your effort is a far different kettle of fish vs storing and transporting blood safely in the middle of summer.Albatros said:I can even change the question. Why is it that it took 30 years to doping doctors to realise that blood doping could work in cycling too, when work by Conconi and others had proven that it was an important boost in endurance sports and moreover, undetectable.
Are you now abandoning your blood doping theory?Albatros said:Hinault didn't want to pass an antidoping test. Hinault defended the use of fortifiers (euphemistic term for doping). He is old school, he tells you he doped without saying so.
Or do you need him to win clean to give credibility to your boy? Sorry, your boy is on the same page as the rest. The difference is that your boy is an attention ***** who can not come to terms that he cheated like the rest.
Well other than the difficulty in handling and storing the blood (made much easier these days, with much better and smaller refrigeration equipment) there is the single overwhelming fact that without EPO the athlete spends too much time in a weakened state after giving blood. Either they can't give enough over the course of the year or they can't train and race hard enough. Also in the 80's nobody could afford to race only one race a year, they raced hard all season, no time to donate and much too much demand for blood bags. Merckx would have needed 20 BBs to have the kind of seasons he had if he was blood doping to win.Albatros said:I have asked you fanboys to provide a single reason for not blood doping in the 80's . Just one. Of course nobody comes with any.
You don't need to have evidence to know certain things are happening. They are just logically happening.
I can even change the question. Why is it that it took 30 years to doping doctors to realise that blood doping could work in cycling too, when work by Conconi and others had proven that it was an important boost in endurance sports and moreover, undetectable.
Albatros said:Hinault didn't want to pass an antidoping test. Hinault defended the use of fortifiers (euphemistic term for doping). He is old school, he tells you he doped without saying so.
Or do you need him to win clean to give credibility to your boy? Sorry, your boy is on the same page as the rest. The difference is that your boy is an attention ***** who can not come to terms that he cheated like the rest.
I believe he is.....his M.O. is to just babble on about stuff he has no more knowledge of than amyone else here. He's been called out numerous times by various posters asking for said proof to back up anything he's said, and as of this moment, still hasn't. Yet, he wonders why no one here takes anything he says serious. I'm done asking him, as I know he just doesn't have any proof on ANYTHING he's said here.MarkvW said:Are you now abandoning your blood doping theory?
And how is this any different to what you do here?86TDFWinner said:I believe he is.....his M.O. is to just babble on about stuff he has no more knowledge of than amyone else here.
Well, Im not coming on here, claiming daily that so and so definitely doped, then provide no proof of it. Im simply asking him(as others have, as they too wonder where he's getting his info from, make such ridiculous claims) to provide the necassary documentation that backs up his claims. I would just like to have the proof either way posted, so we can all read it and go forth. Asking for him to post proof is in no way similar to what he's doing. I don't come on here claiming Lance doped, we all know he has because of years of denial, and evidence thats been released through the years.autologous said:And how is this any different to what you do here?
The USA cycling team in 1984 was poorly funded, yet was still able to blood dope at the 1984 Olympics.runninboy said:As was mentioned the technology available at the time in the 1980's to facilitate blood doping was pretty much nonexistent. Think about this as it puts it all in perspective at least to me. Greg Lemond mentioned once about how they used to sleep in the hallways on hot nights as alot of the hotels in the Tour did not even have air conditioning.
Now in hindsight someone believes that although riders were suffering with a lack of air conditioning , that somehow they magically had the capability to properly refrigerate blood.
Even today those little dorm room refrigerators you find in hotels would not be able to store blood as they have too large of temperature swing. I know this from personal experience with insulin.
However we are supposed to believe that hotels that did not even have air at the time would magically have medical grade refrigerators in each room.
Or maybe the teams carried their own from hotel to hotel with a really long extension cord.
that must be it!![]()
You mean the Olympics in ... USA? Specifically LA? Where they did a 1-day race or a single day TT?silverrocket said:The USA cycling team in 1984 was poorly funded, yet was still able to blood dope at the 1984 Olympics.
It doesn't matter what sort of fridge you have - if the power goes out your blood is going to spoil.silverrocket said:Also, at least 2-3 recent rider/mechanic testimonies seem to indicate that "medical grade" refrigerators are not necessary to keep blood cool. Didn't Armstrong require someone to be checking to make sure the power didn't go out and the blood in his fridge spoil?
No. It suggests you are not thinking clearly at all, and supplying arguments that prove the opposite.silverrocket said:This again suggests Lemond certainly could have cheated his way to TdF victory, but there is still, apparently, no evidence that he actually did.
Yeah we'll have to agree to disagree on that one. He's saying Lemond could have, after providing examples that prove blood doping was used, but not in any scenario that would benefit Lemond.Grandillusion said:Wiggo, silverrockets points were perfectly valid, you're getting overheated.
He ended by saying there is still, after all these years, no evidence that he did cheat in such a way.
Yes, "right before" he won his third tour. April was it?131313 said:Yeah, I do. LeMond actually strikes me as pretty naive in many ways, whether it's believing that Hinault would work for him or that Landis was clean (which he believed for a week until the positive test came out), he actually seems more optimistic than your average clinic poster. It seems to be a pretty clear pattern. So, I could see him buying the whole "lost weight/renewed focus" nonsense.
And since Dr. Coggan answered your question, it would appear that he learned of LA's vo2 numbers right before he won his 3rd tour...
So yeah, I'm basing my opinion on that information. You've really never answered my question though?
Ok even though Wiggo addressed this i want to chime insilverrocket said:The USA cycling team in 1984 was poorly funded, yet was still able to blood dope at the 1984 Olympics.
Also, at least 2-3 recent rider/mechanic testimonies seem to indicate that "medical grade" refrigerators are not necessary to keep blood cool. Didn't Armstrong require someone to be checking to make sure the power didn't go out and the blood in his fridge spoil?