Red Rick said:I expect him to win stages in the 3rd week if he's in the right breakaway. Then I expect him to destroy all life on earth in Colorado![]()
Christian said:Both his Suisse performance as this race are much better than last year. So I think it is justified to hope for a strong performance in the Tour. But since his official role is being a helper for Fränk and Zubeldia, he might not improve on GC compared to last year
murali said:Zubeldia? when has he ever done a top-10 in any GT?
murali said:Zubeldia? when has he ever done a top-10 in any GT?
We all know the good results Zubeldia has but it's a legitimate question because no one has really saw him during those GT'sDazed and Confused said:Are you serious?
Anyway his campaign is usually so invisible nobody will notice him.
Dekker_Tifosi said:Van den Broeck is the new Zubeldia
deValtos said:He was actually quite noticable in the 2003 TDF ... partly because he was wearing a bright orange jersey, but that was definitely his strongest year physically.
For the other tours, unless you were paying attention then you wouldn't have noticed him.
Dekker_Tifosi said:Van den Broeck is the new Zubeldia
while Andy we don’t know what he can do. He’s here to help his brother and during the Tour we’ll see what’s happening with him. I always say that everything is possible with Andy........I don’t want to say Andy is a domestique. Of course he’s not a favourite to win the Tour, because he has no results for three years, but he’s not a domestique. He’s here to help Haimar and Frank in the mountains, but can become the leader of the team depending on how he will feel during the Tour.
Hakkapelit said:Lol, so he came before Mayo in 2003? I would never have guessed that.
Dekker_Tifosi said:Van den Broeck is the new Zubeldia
Alpe d'Huez said:Joseba Belocki comes to mind as a high placing talented rider who never really got a big win, though a horrible crash did his career in. Andreas Kloden is another rider who seemed to place very high, but never truly threaten. However, Andreas seemed to rise above his talent with determination, where as Andy seems to have performed under his level of talent.
Having said that, I'd love to see Andy surprise us this year. He's still only 29.
djpbaltimore said:Beloki is a good comparison. In some respects he should be considered the winner in 2002, right? They both had three straight podium finishes at the TDF and one other podium in a GT (Giro for AS, Vuelta for JB). Neither had sterling palmares outside of the GTs (besides L-B-L 2009) and both had crippling, career threatening crashes. Beloki could only manage 75th in GC after his injury, so I guess everybody should stop being so hard on Andy and his 20th place finish last year!
woodburn said:Andy was a better climber than Beloki, though, and he won major stages to Morzine and on the Tourmalet and Galibier. Beloki never won a stage. Closest I recall was La Mongie in 2002.
woodburn said:Andy was a better climber than Beloki, though, and he won major stages to Morzine and on the Tourmalet and Galibier. Beloki never won a stage. Closest I recall was La Mongie in 2002.