Panda Claws said:Andy has an invisible breakaway partner giving him relays so that he can gain enough time on Menchov in the mountains.
Jannemaan said:Yesturday's tweet from Andy.
Andy Schleck @andy_schleck
I m feeling better every day so I m track for TDF!I keep up good work an good motivation and for everybody I m not worried!
Expand
Panda Claws said:So, Andy can win a tour IF:
* Contador isn't there
* Evans has a giro in his legs and crashed
* Andy has an invisible breakaway partner giving him relays so that he can gain enough time on Menchov in the mountains.
Yeah, he is definitely on top of the pyramid![]()
airstream said:If he'd considered his career "unsuccessful", he would change something. So he's at the top of the pyramid, like it or lump it.
VeloCity said:.
And alternatively racing to win in the Ardennes may cause Alberto to flame out at the Tour. There's no way of knowing until he actually tries it.
So in other words he does what Andy does and picks his spots.
airstream said:One has its career and rides the way one can do it. And it's foolish to critisize someone for discording your cycling ideals. At any rate, saying "for such a huge talent blabla" is presumptuous. Again and again, Andy knows better. Real champions don't niggle using a junk of Algarve or Tour Oman. I support Andy at 100% in this regard.
airstream said:Juanjo, Rollan, Frankie. There will be guys stronger than TTers on the climbs. Why exactly Menchov?
Probably, you don't understand the main thing. Andy is a sorcerer, the man who brings magic into this sport and attracts the eye rather than deadly dull Evans and Menchov. Getting top-3 at the Tour is much harder than winning Giro or Vuelta and evryone knows this. Apparently people who dislike Andy just don't see into cycling at all.
Angliru said:We've got 2 different directors that have worked with Andy who question his motivation and one who he himself has said is part of the reason for many of his successes that questions his current excuse for lack of form. How many signs do you need?
TechnicalDescent said:Schleck after crash...
![]()
Well no, that wasn't the problem, it was that you were just making **** up about both Andy and Alberto.LaFlorecita said:Okay you think Andy is great, I think he isn't. Case closed.
Angliru said:I'd hazard a guess and say that if Contador were to go for the win in the Ardennes he'd just eliminate one of the week-long stage races that he has on his schedule.
Yes Andy does pick his spots as does Contador. It just seems Contador picks quite a few more and has the results to show for it.
VeloCity said:Well no, that wasn't the problem, it was that you were just making **** up about both Andy and Alberto.
But the point is that both the hyperbole about Alberto and the Andy bashing seem rather needless; they're both great but completely different riders.
Nilsson said:There is of course a very good reason why Contador doesn't compete in the Ardennes, and everyone seems to forget about it. His allergies will always be a big problem for him in that period of the year to put out a really good effort...
I don't know if you usually do or not, but you were about Andy and Alberto re: the "always racing to win" "races year round" etc. Clearly that's not true - Alberto does not always race to win nor does he race year-round, while Andy races more than just the 3 weeks in July.LaFlorecita said:Yeah that's what I usually do.
Yes, so there's no need to be making up stuff just to puff up Alberto and put down Andy.Anyway when I read this:
I thought that was the point.How stupid.