The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Parrulo said:stopped listening when you listed wiggins as a role model
Galic Ho said:Wanna bet he's got a sockpuppet account? Take a look around. Most of the Sky fans do.
xestospongin said:That's your call. The message for the entire talk is right up front. Think first before putting something in your body. Science will not fix the problem. We need positive role models and people who are willing to educate to move forward.
The more closed minded we are the slower things will progress. I agree that the messenger is important too. Maybe Wiggins isn't the best role model. I even state, I HOPE that he is a positive role model. Be constructive as opposed to negative; Recommend someone else to use on my next version of the talk.
Sean
xestospongin said:That's your call. The message for the entire talk is right up front. Think first before putting something in your body. Science will not fix the problem. We need positive role models and people who are willing to educate to move forward.
The more closed minded we are the slower things will progress. I agree that the messenger is important too. Maybe Wiggins isn't the best role model. I even state, I HOPE that he is a positive role model. Be constructive as opposed to negative; Recommend someone else to use on my next version of the talk.
Sean
That's because other sports don't test for it.D-Queued said:Wiggins could truly be clean.
However, in the context of the peloton post-EPO introduction , NOBODY with significant palmares since then is a good role model. Period.
For more 'research', please take a look at the Wikipedia page on erythropoietin. You will note that Cycling has its very own special section.
Dave.
The Hitch said:That's because other sports don't test for it.
D-Queued said:Perhaps you can you name one other sport that has signed the Code, but still controls dope testing.
The Hitch said:bassons. Moncoutie. Pinotti (who spoke out against Armstrong in 2009) - unlike wiggins who defended him to the end.
BTw you say "the reality is 6% of our youth will use steroids and 35% will use muscle enhancers".
2 points about that.
first of all, from a delivery pov, it might be worth giving a source for that.
second of all, you then extrapolate that onto a cycling team and say 9 will use steroids and 50 will use muscle enhancers.
But a cycling team is totally different. Youth actively involved in sport are more likely to use peds then the rest of the population. And steroids and muscle enhancers are not the main performance enhancers in cycling (though youth may not have access to others). So the % of a youth cycling team taking peds is likely to be very different to gen pop.
Just an observation.
Tinman said:I totally support "education" on the broader topic of doping to the masses, and to provide a perspective on the health risks. But to sell the message that education is the (or even "one of the primary") solution to reducing/stopping doping by pro-athletes (as UCI is suggesting) is a total joke and reeks of further feeding the pockets of the administrators running these educational programs. As well as diverting critical attention away from diligent sports administration, eg doping control and penalties.
I ask you please, as an "authority" on anti-doping education, make this essential distinction to your audiences. Hope the seminar goes well.
DirtyWorks said:My reading suggests all IOC sports using the bio-passport control testing exactly like the UCI. Maybe I'm wrong. It happens and it's a part of learning, so don't hesitate to correct me.
Hi Sean, thanks for posting your webinar and making a well informed contribution to the forum on an important topic (ie: education). I certainly believe that education is important and one of the best quotes I've read about whether or not cycling is becoming cleaner is from Paul Scott in this article....xestospongin said:hmmm....from a historical perspective getting rid of doping in cycling is about as easy as eradicating street drug use. It is unlikely to happen. My opinion, as I indicate in the lecture, education is one component to this, having a strong police force is certainly another (WADA), but this must be coupled with positive role models and a management/administrative structure that is firmly committed to the process. If one of those elements (especially the last one) does not buy-in to the idea of clean sport the problem will persist. My role, at least the way I see it, is in the education arena. Do I think I will change the world, doubtful. My hope is simply to get the athletes and their support group (parents, managers, coaches & the public) to think about what they eat and drink.
The philosophical question is how do you induce lasting change? As an academic I believe that knowledge is key, and the only way to get knowledge is through education. Hence, even though this is a problem in the peloton and ultimately they have to clean it out themselves we can provide them the information and knowledge they need to expedite the process. ---More opinion than I wanted to state---
I've read about whether or not cycling is becoming cleaner is from Paul Scott in this article....
http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/...armstrong-case
It's clear he (and many others) have ceased talking about tackling the doping problem solely from a biological testing perspective. As you stated in your webinar, and Scott implies in his quotes, we cannot completely eradicate doping.
Your graph of estimated power outputs on climbs (which looks strangely familiar I might add, yet unreferenced?) stops at 2008,
Lastly, but not least, as a scientist you know the importance of giving proper credit where it is due. The original idea which later grew into the forerunner of the biological passport system ie: using indirect measures of the effect of using PEDs to look for a doping "footprint", belongs to Robin Parisotto. He came up with this idea around 1997-1998 which is about 8 or 9yrs before 2006 in which you discuss Don Caitlin's role. Michael Ashenden then became the driving force behind the move from EPO on/off model to biological passport.