Hugh Januss said:Hah, I had forgotten that. I guess that was before his heart grew to 3 times the normal size huh?
Well, all that weight loss, I mean it was systematic training... yeah, that's the ticket.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Hugh Januss said:Hah, I had forgotten that. I guess that was before his heart grew to 3 times the normal size huh?
progressor said:Stranger that you should put armstrong's name in the thread title, yet the whole implied drama you posted is about astana as a whole. It's almost like you have a major anti armstrong agenda. Oh wait.....
By the way when does Sept 5th happen again ??
Mellow Velo said:Damn, it's good.
Yup, a lot of new results there, some obscure to say the least
Tour of Lombardy is a nice little race. Used to be a 2.5, back in the old money days.
However, here's Bertie's and guess what? Just the same. Mucho more wins, of some real oddities.
http://www.cyclingwebsite.net/coureuruitslagenfiche.php?coureurid=1567
burninglegs said:
This article isn't based on any facts, the UCI denies it, and no one on Astana
tested positive for banned substances. I think the article was published just to sell the papers. The article doesn't pass the journalistic smell test & was probably written because of the love and sympathy that the French have for some unmentioned rider. I think the French have the major anti armstrong agenda. This is my first post. Hello everyone.
Bag_O_Wallet said:Roughly 100 wins recorded for Tex, and about 50 for Bert.
Some context... the single season victory record by Merckx is 54.
Yes and many of the wins are so obscure.peloton said:Heh, Tex is 38, Bert 26.....
Eddy will remain the cycling legend, no one will come close to him.
burninglegs said:
This article isn't based on any facts, the UCI denies it, and no one on Astana
tested positive for banned substances. I think the article was published just to sell the papers. The article doesn't pass the journalistic smell test & was probably written because of the love and sympathy that the French have for some unmentioned rider. I think the French have the major anti armstrong agenda. This is my first post. Hello everyone.
burninglegs said:
This article isn't based on any facts, the UCI denies it, and no one on Astana
tested positive for banned substances. I think the article was published just to sell the papers. The article doesn't pass the journalistic smell test & was probably written because of the love and sympathy that the French have for some unmentioned rider. I think the French have the major anti armstrong agenda. This is my first post. Hello everyone.
Mellow Velo said:Yes and many of the wins are so obscure.
I kept my palmares to UCI rated 2.1 or above races and up to Armstong matching Contador's current age.
Then, you end up with one very short list and another much longer list.
Shows how statistics can say pretty much anything.
thehog said:The key to not storing the sample correctly means it much more difficult to ascertain a positive as there is too much "noise" in the testing to affirm a positive. This is especially true when testing for EPO and micro dosing.
When never hear of these tests. They are just marked negative or "non conclusive" - no result.
burninglegs said:
This article isn't based on any facts, the UCI denies it, and no one on Astana
tested positive for banned substances. I think the article was published just to sell the papers. The article doesn't pass the journalistic smell test & was probably written because of the love and sympathy that the French have for some unmentioned rider. I think the French have the major anti armstrong agenda. This is my first post. Hello everyone.
Race Radio said:why is it every Armstrong groupies starts off with the "French Conspiracy" story?
It is a FACT that Astana avoided testing for 55 minutes when the testers showed up in the morning. It is also a FACT that after the TTT Astana kept the chaperon waiting outside for 40 minutes.
Race Radio said:why is it every Armstrong groupies starts off with the "French Conspiracy" story?
It is a FACT that Astana avoided testing for 55 minutes when the testers showed up in the morning. It is also a FACT that after the TTT Astana kept the chaperon waiting outside for 40 minutes.
burninglegs said:
This article isn't based on any facts, the UCI denies it, and no one on Astana
tested positive for banned substances. I think the article was published just to sell the papers. The article doesn't pass the journalistic smell test & was probably written because of the love and sympathy that the French have for some unmentioned rider. I think the French have the major anti armstrong agenda. This is my first post. Hello everyone.
thehog said:Bordry and Rieu also said they were surprised to have seized during the Tour a number of substances that were not performance-enhancing as such but could have been used as part of doping methods.
"Drugs against high blood pressure or diabetes are incongruous when dealing with people supposedly in good health," Rieu said.
"We were a bit surprised to see the range of medicine being taken by the riders," Bordry said.
The UCI and the AFLD had agreed to work together on the Tour de France, but the sport's governing body is now considering another option for next year's race.
None of the tests performed during the 2009 Tour turned out to be positive.
(Writing by Patrick Vignal, Editing by Ed Osmond; To query or comment on this story email sportsfeedback@thomsonreuters.com)
WonderLance said:Will you be my friend. They all think I'm an idiot two.