This is an unbelievable story and reminds me of that famous saying "a fool is easily parted with his money." I wasn't kidding when I previously said private initiatives in the so called realm of charity, often amount to just the commercialization of whatever the donated money is being raised for. Public, state financed and obligatory contributions through taxation to things like cancer research, while less "sexy" than having stupid people who need to have faith in someone as a basis to contribute to a corporate cause, at least avoids the worst exploitative and deceptive natures of such private initiatives. The argument that beauracratic contortions and misuse of tax funds are reasons to reject such state enterprises as inefficient and corrupt, loses much of its value when one considers just the overhead costs of running and promoting private so called charity foundations alone like Liestrong; especially in light of glaring instances of profiteering like this. Moreover I don’t even mention his foundation having paid for the private jets that flew him around to dope at 30,000 feet above sea level during the years of impunity. Other than charity! With all the problems of public foundations, they are still more democratic and principled than the private charities, so-called, which all too often become unscrupulous business enterprises. I'm not saying they are all bad, however, most people don't really consider how the money is actually being used and if such intiatives are in fact the best means to fund medical research, or are they more about celebrity appeal and, in this case, the cult of personality.