Ninety5rpm said:LOL!
You forgot: Ninety5rpm is never sober.
Sorry, I did say I nodded off here and there.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Ninety5rpm said:LOL!
You forgot: Ninety5rpm is never sober.
Clemson Cycling said:We are quite skint here in the US as well. A trillion dollars in debt from this year alone. Doesn't stop the US from donating. This is where the United States differs from the rest of the world.
Hugh Januss said:OK not the most clever post I've seen, but let me try to fill you in on some of the findings.
1) Lance is either a great humanitarian who has dug deep into his own pockets to help those who are in need, or a douche who steals money that people have donated to fight cancer in order to make a show of helping people in need.
2) Apparently some times 2 wrongs do make a right particularly if you are wiping out thousands of innocent people in order to prevent a despot from wiping out thousands of innocent people. As long as you are in the "real world".
3) It is possible to be anti-religion but in favor of a war which is largely a religious war.
4) SOME KITTENS IN A OVEN DON'T MAKEM BISCUTTS
5) ChrisE plans on getting drunk a little later on, and wishes the other forum members would not pick on Lance so much.
6) Oncearunner is getting drunk as we speak and struggles with English as a first language.
7)Moondance needs to calm down, and Nick shouldn't be so patronizing.
I think those are most of the important points that have been raised here, although I may have missed 1 or 2 as I did nod off a couple times while reading the thread myself. In the future please try to get yourself up to speed before jumping in, I can't spend time doing all this research every time.
BikeCentric said:God bless Lance Armstrong, he rivals Mother Theresa in his selfless generosity. He truly deserves to be canonized during his illustrious lifetime. Viva Saint Lance!
Awolpe said:100% whatever the critics say its still charity for a good cause and one of neccesity
Deagol said:I know this is wayyyyy off-topic, but
Isn't there plenty of this type of thing in the Bible (an eye for an eye, and all that)
It's also nice to cherry-pick what you decide to believe and ignore the rest from a book like that (i.e. the "pork" thing). Just saying, since you started the point about "rationalizing" and the irony of that is not lost on some.
Ye have heard that it hath been said, `An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.' But I say unto you that ye resist not evil, but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if any man will sue thee at the law and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloak also. And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him two. Give to him that asketh thee; and from him that would borrow of thee, turn not thou away. - Matthew 5: 38-42
bianchigirl said:A chunk of which will be going to the Clinton Foundation - well, with the run for Governor in 2012 it's never to early to start greasing a few palms...
Sorry to be cynical - of course we may never know who has donated privately because those of us who aren't media *****s and publicity hounds usually prefer to give discreetly - self congratulation is just so vulgar, however good the cause
ChrisE said:Well then maybe you should read it from the start instead of whining with your last page clicking ignorant dumba$$.
Here's something that needs some insight; maybe you can help:
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2010/01/13/crimesider/entry6092717.shtml
This goes back to my earlier grief. If Pat Robertson knew they made a devil's pact with France 200 years ago, where has all the preemptive praying been to cleanse this EQ-in-waiting all these years?
Now, the realization that LA didn't donate his personal money just really ****es us off even more.
Hibbles said:But then surely none of us are so cynical about him that we would believe he would use the death of thousands of people for publicity/image reasons or personal gain...
Ninety5rpm said:WHY does everyone thinks this?
Do you really not know what "on behalf of" means???
It's Armstrong's PERSONAL money, donated ON BEHALF of his foundation.
That means HE is giving HIS personal money, but the foundation gets the credit.
Digger said:http://www.independent.ie/entertain...ionaire---the-chuck-feeney-story-1726824.html
Chuck Feeney has donated 750 million US dollars to third level institutions here in Ireland. One condition - if the Universities said where the money came, he would cease the donations. That for me is doing things for the right reason.
bianchigirl said:Perhaps the title of the thread should be 'Livestrong to donate...' which would be factually accurate?
dimspace said:It does not say the money came from livestrong, but purely on behalf of.. for instance, if i wanted to donate $250,000 dollars but did not want the publicity myself but saw it as an opportunity to publicise another charity i would donate it and they would send the money "on behalf of"...
twodimensional said:And then you would personally hold a press conference to announce the donation
L29205 said:For the people involved, money is money. Who care where it comes from or what the motives are for donating. Money is money at these times.
Don't like LA or the foundation but still help is needed.
I started a post on the general forum on what you are afraid of. THIS should be it for all of us. No one should judge where help comes from at a time of need.
richwagmn said:You guys just need to lighten up and print some more money. Join the party.
ScienceIsCool said:Unless you have cancer and were hoping some of the LIVESTRONG money was going to help you out... You know, the cancer charity. The one that has a mandate for helping cancer victims.
John Swanson
ScienceIsCool said:Unless you have cancer and were hoping some of the LIVESTRONG money was going to help you out... You know, the cancer charity. The one that has a mandate for helping cancer victims.
John Swanson
dimspace said:AGain.. nowhere does it say that it was livestrong money destined for cancer victims that was donated... "on behalf of"
L29205 said:For the people involved, money is money. Who care where it comes from or what the motives are for donating. Money is money at these times.
Don't like LA or the foundation but still help is needed.
I started a post on the general forum on what you are afraid of. THIS should be it for all of us. No one should judge where help comes from at a time of need.
pedaling squares said:Amen. A few million Haitians receiving food, water, or medical supplies have far more important things on their mind than questions about who gave what and with what motive in mind.