Well it seems my last post hit the spot and stopped everyone from trolling for a minute, which I suppose is a good thing. Problem is, if I start frantically responding to everyone then I will be accused of highjack the thread. Here's one though...
Doesn't sound like you're particularly sure. We want a hard translation, not more people saying they get the jist of the context.
Why is it different? Nobody has said this before. And others admit that IV equipment is allowed for "medical emergencies" i.e dehydration, so it doesn't seem like you have your facts right on that.
No they can be used for vitamins. Some teams now have a no needle rule, but many still use them - a jab on the bum. Greg LeMond admits to using iron injections. Again you have your facts wrong.
But you may know about the new and more unstable method of detecting DNA that was used in the McCanns case, for instance, and much criticsed, and used in this case in Italy, that is much less trustworthy and vague. It can be found on any surface. We will have to see what type of DNA they claim to have. If it was hard traditional DNA from blood, hair or saliva, that can be used in court, it seems to me they would have come forward by now. What on earth is the hold up?
Glad to help you out on this.