Re:
hrotha said:
Escarabajo, I don't have a problem with Astana backing Aru ahead of Landa. I'd have done the same.
What I'm saying is they should have used Landa, as their 2nd card, to put pressure on Contador and tire him out for Aru to take advantage of. Like the day of Madonna di Campiglio, when they managed to isolate Contador and they decided to just domestique for him instead of sending Landa up the road. They didn't try to get people in the breaks to act as bridges either.
Simply put, they didn't try team tactics despite having the strongest team and despite their rival being mostly on his own.
I agree that they should have tried something earlier on Madonna. It was noticable from the CinqueTerre stage that Astana were the strongest team, but everyone expected Contador to be the strongest individually, so the question was how to break Contador, especially after his crash. When you don't succeed, it can depend on tactics, luck and/or not being able to pedal fast enough. Of all the teams in the Giro, Astana are the team you could argue suffered most from bad tactics (Kruiswijk and Hesjedal lost out in the first week, but was that a result of bad tactics or having weak teams which meant they were out of position? I can't say).
Let's look at the stages which were most meaningful for GC
On the weekend before the first rest day, on Saturday the two main climbs were too far apart for a tactical stage, so trying to set up an attack on a big MTF seemed the logical thing to do. Contador responded to the first attack, he was isolated against Landa and Aru, so they went to opposite sides of the road and Contador marks Aru. Obviously, Landa attacks and they go stage hunting. Possible tactical mistake: they started chasing too late, so missed out on a possible stage victory to Intxausti.
On Sunday, the parcours is up and down all day, so team tactics are going to be more important. Tiralongo gets into the early break. Astana go hard on the hard climbs in the middle of the stage and most of Saxo get dropped, Cataldo goes on the attack (though does not get much time). The race gets neutralised on the descent, virtually all the Saxo guys get back into the peloton and from there until the last steep climb, the climbs are pretty gentle, so they wait for the last climb, where Land and Aru attack but don't break Contador. Failure due to bad luck and not being able to pedal fast enough.
The Madonna stage could have been crucial. At the bottom of the last climb, Astana have 5 guys against Contador in the front group, but Rogers and Kreuziger are only 25 seconds behind. So driving it at the bottom to elimate Mick and Roman is logical. Certainly Astana could have attacked earlier, Cataldo would have been a good option as he was still high on GC, but had been dropped on the penultimate climb. Thus Landa would have been the obvious choice, but two things seemed to speak against this. 1) the Madonna starts off as a power climb, not ideal for Landa, 2) Aru was not feeling great that day, so possibly didn't want Landa to attack, but be in the mix at the end when it got steep. Result: Landa gets stage win since is slightly stronger than Contador, who in turn is stronger than Aru. Failure, possibly due to tactics, but also due to not being able to pedal fast enough. Aru is the closest to Contador, with Aru losing only a handful of seconds when weaker than Contador and a stage win seems a good return.
Mortirolo to come