John Stevenson said:
How is it fraud when they're all on the juice anyway? ...The only people being fooled are those daft enough to believe there's anyone clean in the top echelon of pro sports.
John, you're the editor; you're not supposed to admit you believe that even if you think it! I'm as fed up as anyone, but it sounds like you need a vacation (holiday).
Seriously, I think this law really misses the mark. I've posted some of this many times, but will again:
• The dopers dilemma takes precedent over this. Just like capital or corporal punishment, it's not necessarily the
severity of punishment that's a deterrent, as much as the
certainty of it. If cheaters don't think they'll get caught, and their experience shows this to be true, you could have a 20 year minimum sentence, and it won't change much.
• This continues to focus on only part of the problem - the riders. What about the support? What about going after the doctors? Trainers? Coaches? Soigners? Why no concentration on the suppliers? We still rely almost entirely on the police to stop the supply rings, when the police feels up to it. Why concentrate all efforts only on the riders?
• This continues to enforce the omerta, as pointed out. With his rule what incentives are there for riders to wish to break the cycle of deceit? Jesus Manzano's confession helped directly lead to Puerto. If he faced a possible 10 year prison sentence, do you think he would have talked?
• As noted, where's the incentive? Where's the focus on education? To me, a group like BikePure is making small, but real strides in helping clean up the sport. Similar to Ross and Jonathan at Science of Sport. We need more people like this, not to have them ignored.