BroDeal said:And thus begins the annual tradition of Durian using replies to any and every subject to tell us which pro team allowed him to tag along. I am suprised this one did not come with a picture.
here is the picture

BroDeal said:And thus begins the annual tradition of Durian using replies to any and every subject to tell us which pro team allowed him to tag along. I am suprised this one did not come with a picture.
durianrider said:Average speed means squat. You could be on the front, at the back, tail wind, head wind...
Once I averaged 13.3km for 4:58 into a gail force headwind whilst riding solo across the Nullabor plain.
Yesterday I did 200km with Team Garmin and my TSS score was 431 and IF was .742. Thats more of a predictor of effort.
Average speed in 2012 is like using toe straps.
daveinzambia said:I am sorry but average speed may mean squat to you in your training. That is not true for everyone.
if used over time, for riders that ride on their own on similar roads it can be a way of measuring an improvement
not everyone who rides a big is trying to be a professional athlete, but then you are good at grouping large numbers of people together and making assumptions about them...
BroDeal said:I am an expert at that and, despite how it pains me, have to agree with Durian. Average speed means very little. You can be in great condition, need a half hour to get the engine warmed up, and your average speed will suck. As I have gotten older I have found that I need more time before I start feeling good during a ride.
daveinzambia said:But what is a useful measure. I am an unfit middle aged man trying to get fitter by getting back into bike riding. In order to motivate myself for this i want some sort of measure of how i am going on my rides and generally how things are changing with time.
I have limited time for training and tend to train on 2 or 3 largely similar routes all the time.
seems the easiest thing to compare is how long it is taking me to do those various rides. As i do vary the exact route slightly then choose to use average speed rather than absolute time. yes it takes a little time for my body to wake up, but generally it is the same amount of time on each ride.
I think for above situation average speed is a good fit. if you are training to race then maybe not, but in my case not sure what would be a better measure.
Tapeworm said:Time at X effort.
Tapeworm said:Basically yes. Or Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE).
So instead of "hold 32kph for 10mins" which is highly variable depending on terrain an environmental factors the holding of an effort or HR (or power) for a given duration would be better.
Timed climbs are also a good measure of effective effort as usually your speed would not vary AS much as on the flat.
daveinzambia said:But what is a useful measure. I am an unfit middle aged man trying to get fitter by getting back into bike riding. In order to motivate myself for this i want some sort of measure of how i am going on my rides and generally how things are changing with time.
I have limited time for training and tend to train on 2 or 3 largely similar routes all the time.
seems the easiest thing to compare is how long it is taking me to do those various rides. As i do vary the exact route slightly then choose to use average speed rather than absolute time. yes it takes a little time for my body to wake up, but generally it is the same amount of time on each ride.
I think for above situation average speed is a good fit. if you are training to race then maybe not, but in my case not sure what would be a better measure.
BroDeal said:And thus begins the annual tradition of Durian using replies to any and every subject to tell us which pro team allowed him to tag along. I am suprised this one did not come with a picture.
EDIT: I did notice that he posted the same info to two threads. I have this suspicion that after pro teams leave Australia, the riders regale each other with tales of a vegan stalker.
BroDeal said:And thus begins the annual tradition of Durian using replies to any and every subject to tell us which pro team allowed him to tag along. I am suprised this one did not come with a picture.
EDIT: I did notice that he posted the same info to two threads. I have this suspicion that after pro teams leave Australia, the riders regale each other with tales of a vegan stalker.
Boeing said:And we notice how much the average narcissist hates competition
BroDeal said:As I have gotten older I have found that I need more time before I start feeling good during a ride.
about amarathon marke said:When I was doing ultras back in the '80s, it might take me 30 miles before I started feeling good. Now I'm in my mid-50s and wondering how long I will have to ride before I start feeling good again.(just trying to add some levity to the thread)
daveinzambia said:But what is a useful measure. I am an unfit middle aged man trying to get fitter by getting back into bike riding. In order to motivate myself for this i want some sort of measure of how i am going on my rides and generally how things are changing with time.
I have limited time for training and tend to train on 2 or 3 largely similar routes all the time.
daveinzambia said:But what is a useful measure. I am an unfit middle aged man trying to get fitter by getting back into bike riding. In order to motivate myself for this i want some sort of measure of how i am going on my rides and generally how things are changing with time.
I have limited time for training and tend to train on 2 or 3 largely similar routes all the time.
seems the easiest thing to compare is how long it is taking me to do those various rides. As i do vary the exact route slightly then choose to use average speed rather than absolute time. yes it takes a little time for my body to wake up, but generally it is the same amount of time on each ride.
I think for above situation average speed is a good fit. if you are training to race then maybe not, but in my case not sure what would be a better measure.
DirtyWorks said:2. Create an account at Strava.
Boeing said:Strava was a novelty for like 5 or 10 rides. like all the gps data stuff I grew uninterested in looking where i'd been and I looked at it maybe once. and the only real benefit I get out of all these gizmos is my recovery time between big efforts while riding. morning group rides its group tempo so alleged personal bests aren't real. The other thing is I rarely take the exact same routes every training ride except the weekly group rides and then again same as above.
So what are they good for like dude check my strava and beat that bro? really ok I'm gone log on and compare and contrast myself to everyone. really? for what exactly? I dont set the car gps to bread crumb either. What for again?
ElChingon said:They're meant to track your training, the added social aspect is pretty ridiculous as you state where somebody might get a tow once and set a world (well Strava) record. Who really cares about what the other people are getting achievement-wise. It has benefits when you gauge your own performance against yourself on a predefined route. I do like having friends in a common group where you know they're not getting tows and compare to your training buddies or just friends who ride.
Aristarchus said:Where I ride, there are some variables (namely the wind near the rivers) that make average speed a shaky metric. I'm not very gung-ho about my stats, but my HR monitor tells me pretty quickly how much I'm fighting the wind to maintain a certain speed. If I could breeze through an area at 30 km/h yesterday while maintaining 135 bpm, and today I'm doing the same at 170+ bpm, then it is easier to show the extra effort I'm putting in.