9000ft said:While that might be a point of view worthy of debate, IMO, if pro cycling burns, at least in the US and maybe Europe it will not recover, at least not for a long time. Many teams will loose their sponsorship, good people will loose their jobs and races, already on shaky ground due to the economy will loose sponsors and shut down.
I know for a lot of people who post here, no price is too big to pay to bring down Lance Armstrong, but I'm guessing it's not their jobs that will be effected if pro cycling "burns"
Plus, I'm not so sure that even if it where to be "rebuilt" it will be very much different in regards to PEDs. PEDs have been a part of pro sports for as long as there have been PEDs and I suspect that as long as there is big money to be made throwing a ball, or racing a bicycle and as long as everybody loves a winner and nobody loves a looser PEDs will be with us. (2nd, place, just the first place looser and nothing is worse than a doper - except for someone who races like they're clean). That's something probably no one, including those who are using the PEDs are happy about, but we don't live in a pure realm of clean and righteous sportsmanship. Pro athletics is a competitive business and anyone in business will tell you, it's always a game of pushing the limits to find an edge.
None of that's to say the best possible anti doping techniques and strong rules fairly and completely enforced shouldn't be part of the game, But IMO, to think that any pro sport is ever going to be some bastion of clean sportsmanship is a bit naive.
It's NAIVE, not naive. In mythology the Phoenix always burns, is reborn, and all is well. In fantasy land, pro cycling will burn, be reborn and all will be well. You're trying to explain the real world to people who live in fantasy land without the benefit of a myth. But you know what they say, good intentions pave the road to heLL.