The difference between those two races is that there was serious action in Roubaix from 120k to go.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
In terms of time racing, that probably wasn't too different from the action starting with 75km to go yesterday.Alexandre B. said:The difference between those two races is that there was serious action in Roubaix from 120k to go.
Red Rick said:There was this thing called the Giro? I think it was absolutely amazeballs spectecular for like more than a week.
In Rio the crashes happened after the action whereas in Roubaix the action happened after the crashes.Alexandre B. said:The difference between those two races is that there was serious action in Roubaix from 120k to go.
Alexandre B. said:The difference between those two races is that there was serious action in Roubaix from 120k to go.
Terrible winner??? How so? Hayman's ride was brilliantEl Pistolero said:Roubaix had a terrible winner, so I vote the Olympics lol.
Libertine Seguros said:Poll is a bit unfair now though, as we've had TWO awesome Olympic Road Races this year.
There was some good action on the first circuit, as you had Kopecky alone in the front but she was something of an irrelevance (she's mostly a sprinter), but the counter-move over the hill had van Dijk, Plichta and Bronzini, so Netherlands and Italy weren't going to help, so first Worrack then Armstrong chased across and the question was who would take responsibility to chase as most of the big nations were represented. Garfoot tried but failed to get across; Pooley was doing a lot of work and trying to get the Aussies to help, which they weren't keen to do; at the same time Harris was suffering on the climbs so Pooley couldn't go too hard or she'd isolate Lizzie; at one point she and Gracie Elvin tried to bridge instead because the gap was up at almost a minute, but Vos marked them out of it, then the group eventually came back together; once stronger climbers were trying to bridge the weaker climbers in the group such as van Dijk and Bronzini stopped working. On the final time up the last climb of the circuit, van Dijk again upped the tempo, and you had elite climbers all at the front of the group with Longo Borghini, Niewiadoma, Moolman-Pasio, Lichtenberg and Stevens all visible; the bunch was shattered and splintered into three groups on the descent, but so many strong names were caught behind it (including Vos so the Dutch sat up) that it came back together with about 50 to go, as a result it was then kind of cagey for the next 20k apart from Cordon's brief solo foray.Kwibus said:Libertine Seguros said:Poll is a bit unfair now though, as we've had TWO awesome Olympic Road Races this year.
I was about to post this. Allthough I can not really judge as I only watched the final 30km of the womens race.
P-R and men Olympics had action with over 100km to go. Allthough not non-stop there was good racing before 100km to go and I don't really think that happened with the women, but that race is a lot shorter as well. That final 30km made up for a lot though.
gunara said:A rider rode solo towards the line with two others chasing, plus a wave of attacks from some seemingly hopeless groups of riders in the final laps, and the fact that all those involved several types of riders...this ORR's so special. And Cancellara pulled for an invisible chance, Purito waved, Froome sped up and than got dropped by everyone that rode up to him, won't forget those moments...
But that "whoa, wtf have I just watched" moment when PR ended...nothing compares. It beats everything for me.
In such a nice year for biggrst one day races, I dare hope even Doha will exceed our expectation, which is not that hard for it to do
Cannibal72 said:An interesting lesson from both these races is that, if done properly, wall-to-wall coverage of a one-day race can really work. The Czech attack in the OGRR, for example, would have been missed completely by most people if the TV coverage had started with 100km to go, and, for the die-hards following a text-based tracker, would have been glossed over as a few splits which ultimately came to naught. It also allowed us to see the composition of the break, which is always pretty interesting. More abstractly, I felt more invested in the OGRR for having watched it the whole way through, and the actually fairly long periods where basically nothing happened didn't frustrate me as much as they did in the Tour, because I knew there was enough time for someone to try something, and because I could watch stuff like who was taking on the burden of chasing, which would turn out important later. The lesson is, I think, that it's foolish to underestimate an audience's intelligence and pull a Guillen, by packing all the excitement into the last 10km: people who don't usually watch cycling watched this race through, and I'm pretty sure they enjoyed it. Next year, all the Tour stages will be televised all through, but I'm not sure it will work in a GT format. The great appeal of one-day racing is that this race is your chance to win. There's no third week to make it back on, and no one cares about 8th place: you have to try something now. So while I'm sure the ASO's TV coverage will be infinitely better than Rio's, and that they'll hit their Chateau Quota ten times over, I'm not convinced it will be the right move.
SafeBet said:Roubaix by a solid margin for me. Best race in a long time, possibly the best I've ever watched.
I'd still rate ORR and PR higher but I'm pretty sure some people would have voted Lombardia this year. This thread really was hasty.PremierAndrew said:BigMac said:Year / Season ain't even over...
Please raname the thread to ''Which of ORR and P-R was the better race?'', or something along those lines.
What's going to be better than those two? Lombardia with that course?
Gigs_98 said:I'd still rate ORR and PR higher but I'm pretty sure some people would have voted Lombardia this year. This thread really was hasty.PremierAndrew said:BigMac said:Year / Season ain't even over...
Please raname the thread to ''Which of ORR and P-R was the better race?'', or something along those lines.
What's going to be better than those two? Lombardia with that course?