- Mar 4, 2010
- 1,826
- 0
- 0
Afrank said:My arguement for why Purito was better than wiggins is because he did well in GT's and classic races. Where Wiggins only did well in stage races, more specifically the TT's.
GT's and TT's are different races you know. When was the last time someone was the best stage racer AND the best TT'er? Lance, I guess. So Wiggins did well in 2 different types of races and by "did well" I mean DOMINATED both. Now, when you say J-Rod "did well" in stage races, you mean he almost won something.
By saying Wiggins never had to dig deep to preserve his lead I meant 2 things, 1. that the races he won were well adapted to him (especially the tour) and 2. the guys he was competeing with weren't at the same level as the guys that Purito had to compete with. Purito's competition was much better and IMO stronger than Wiggins competitors (I'm talking mostly about the Vuelta here so don't start talking about guys like Nibali or Froome vs. Hesjedal or De Gendt).
Why should Valverde be rated a level higher than Nibali in GT's? The latter has better results. What races did J-Rod win that did not suit him?