zigmeister said:A few problems with her statement about the medical room.
Armstrong's primary cancer doctor, Craig Nichols, submitted a sworn affidavit in the case saying, "I have never seen any evidence, either from myself or any other doctor, that indicates Lance Armstrong admitted, suggested or indicated that he has ever taken performance-enhancing drugs."
I would surmise that if medical staff had come into a room asking questions about medical history, wouldn't that be written down in your medical records? Of course it would. And as a good doctor should, review all of Lance's medical records, that would include seeing information regarding medication and drug use correct? This is 101 doctor stuff. Fill out this form, what have you taken or are you taking for medication/drugs currently? Then the assistant, or doctor asks you verball typically again regarding this stuff.
Interesting how his primary oncologist has stated, he has no knowledge of any of this information that by all medical standards and procedure, be written down and part of Lance's medical records. So where are Lance's medical records? Protected by confidentiality for nobody to see? I'm sure that could easily be leaked out, or would have been by now..yet hasn't for some reason.
Pure genius.
Amazing that no one has brought up those arguments before.
1. Nichols wasn't in the room and his affidavit carries little to no merit. He does not refute the event, he can only state that he has no knowledge of the Armstrong statement.
2. The doctors asking him the question weren't taking his history. Armstrong had already been in the hospital quite some time and the official history had been taken at the time of his admission. The hospital is a teaching hospital, with med students in and out of rooms all day. If a teaching physician entered the room with a med student or intern in a teaching capacity, there would be no reason to enter the responses into the official records.