It's arrogance.Well, Søren Kragh has gone on the record and said that Van Der Poel was simply too strong today.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
It's arrogance.Well, Søren Kragh has gone on the record and said that Van Der Poel was simply too strong today.
And I'm calling ***. Just a poor attempt at trying to make anything less of that victory. The motors aren't as close as you think. You know they have a telelens.
Instead of what this should have been, applauding the winner and enjoying the final. I think it's just a poor attempt at hiding frustration that a Dane didn't win. No coincedance it's Danes that bring it up in the topic
To be honest, I was really annoyed by each of Kragh's victories because I was rooting for Sagan. But he won by huge margins each time. Mathieu had two seconds to spare.
I don't quite understand. Are you criticizing a rider who took the initiative and risking it all on the long distance?To be honest, I was really annoyed by each of Kragh's victories because I was rooting for Sagan. But he won by huge margins each time. Mathieu had two seconds to spare.
Sorry, I'm going to have to remove your citizenship!
I don't quite understand. Are you criticizing a rider who took the initiative and risking it all on the long distance?
I've allways very much liked courage and spontanity in any race, especially when it's paid off by a very deserved victory.
Ah in that way. It's fair to have idolsOr course I'm not criticising him... I just hoped it would end in a sprint.
Brb you'll find me in the Clinic![]()
surely, that average speed was wrong ?![]()
![]()
surely, that average speed was wrong ?![]()
What a performance today by Mathieu. Deserved that win thoroughly. Managed to stay away from an elite group of riders after a lot of questions were being asked about his form this season.
A true display of absolute courage and determination only to be admired and respected by true cycling fans. I was at the edge of my seat until the very last pedal stroke.
Cycling has won today, everyone should appreciate that.
Okay, I don't think this should turn into a nationality issue but Søren Kragh would win those two stages without the motos, no question at all.
Van der Poel would not have made it to the finish today without motos. But it was a brilliant ride by him nonetheless.
And I'm calling ***. Just a poor attempt at trying to make anything less of that victory. The motors aren't as close as you think. You know they have a telelens.
Instead of what this should have been, applauding the winner and enjoying the final. I think it's just a poor attempt at hiding frustration that a Dane didn't win. No coincedance it's Danes that bring it up in the topic
Good then that we have the neutral and level headed Dutch to explain the situation.
im sorry but it just pisses me off to much.
You just saw this stage, a 50km solo and an exciting stage. And the first thing you talk about is moto's?? I can't see it loose from their nationality then
More like, Wout and Mathieu from CX can go deep for a long time, if that’s what you meant.The CX guys can really go deep for a long time.
5/ Surprise surprise: somebody is going to be motorpaced in a cycling race and most of the time that somebody will be an attacker.I will pretend like you guys actually want to hear my opinion:
When van der Poel dropped Sénéchal, and there was still a chance the Frenchman could come back, Mathieu was 100% getting motorpaced. It was not a fair fight. However, after about 10km, the camerabike started riding behind Mathieu or next to him. From then on, it were the chasers that often got motorpaced. When Pedersen attacked, when Cortina attacked, when Sütterlin was setting the pace for the chase... they were also definitely being paced by the camerabike for miles. Between 40k -10k from the finish, the chasers definitely got more motorpaced than Mathieu. When SKA, Naesen, Küng, Colbrelli... dropped Pedersen, they were also still being motorpaced. In the back, Pedersen was also getting motorpaced chasing the SKA group. Camerabike still behind Mathieu at this point, with 17k to go. From +/-15k from the finish, the camerabike with the SKA group, also got behind the group, while Pedersen was still getting dragged. Every so often a different motorbike would get in front to take pictures or with the time (this happened with all groups) but not enough to make much of a difference or too far ahead. With 10k to go, the Claeys/Lampaert attack was motorpaced initially until they had a gap, then the camera got behind them, but still no motor in front of Mathieu. In the final 7k, the camerabike again got in front of Mathieu.
Conclusions:
1/ Best man won
2/ He did get motorpaced on crucial moments, but not more than the chasers. Likely significantly less.
3/ If he wouldn't have been motorpaced, he wouldn't have won. If NOBODY would have been motorpaced, he would have won.
4/ Evenepoel would have won by 3 minutes.
This is actually not true according to what i have noticed (unless it's TDF). When a large group or peloton is chasing, it makes no sense for the camera to be filming the back of that group. In 99% of cases, this group will get a camerabike in front.5/ Surprise surprise: somebody is going to be motorpaced in a cycling race and most of the time that somebody will be an attacker.
![]()
surely, that average speed was wrong ?![]()