Damiano Machiavelli said:
I did not agree with you at all. Contador had just finished the most difficult grand tour in at least a couple of decades. In addition to that he injured his knee. You cannot compare how he did at the Tour to previous years. You are left with only the Schlecks to compare, and Andy spends more time drinking than he does training. With all the other contenders out of contention, there is not enough data to do a meaningful comparison. I also point out that Evans' supporters are quick to play up Evans performance relative to the Schlecks as a sign that less doping has now made the clean Cadel a winner, but they are not too keen to draw the opposite conclusion by comparing Evans' performance to that of the riders like Cunego.
As I said, the GC situation of this year's Tour was too messed up to draw any conclusions about.
Right let me get this straight, you are saying that all the top riders have been on a level playing field wrt doping for the past 5-6yrs, however this year, Contador and Shleck performed worse, not due to advances in the bio passport detection method, but only due to ill preparation and injury. Whereas, Cunego has improved relative to Cadel this year and therefore, Cadel must still be doping because he won??
I disagree with this based on the following. For starters you simply cannot make assumptions about doping by comparing the results of different riders from one year to another alone. I am basing my opinion mostly on the published data which demonstrates that 1. there are fewer abnormal blood profiles this year than any point in the last 10yrs, and 2. blood transfusions are beginning to be detected with the bio passport. Regardless, even when we do use your line of reasoning it can be seen that Cunego didn't change his performance relative to Cadel this year. Cadel's palmares are slightly better overall than Cunego, and that is exactly how the tdf ended up this year. Secondly, Cunego also signed on to work with Aldo Sassi last year, yet he did NOT suddenly start performing noticeably better or worse, which according to your logic is an indication that Cunego hasn't changed his doping (or lack thereof) practices pre vs post undergoing the Mapei lab testing procedures. Thirdly, just as Cadel improved
relative to Contador and Shleck, then so must have Cunego.
Cunego and Lampre-Farnese Vini poised to begin working with Sassi
Sassi is best known as the coach of 2009 world champion Cadel Evans, 2010 Giro d’Italia winner Ivan Basso and former world TT champ Michael Rogers. He works with riders on the basis that they undergo a full battery of anti-doping tests, including the full body hemoglobin measurements which help ensure they haven’t undergone transfusions.
Read more:
http://www.velonation.com/News/ID/5...o-begin-working-with-Sassi.aspx#ixzz1Tqoeteyv
Cunego AND Cadel both improved relative to Contador and Schleck this year, so maybe you are right and they are all still doping mad, Aldo Sassi and his Mapei lab tests are bogus smokescreens, the published studies on the bio passport are rubbish, and Contador and Shleck only performed worse through ill prepartion and injury.
Or maybe, just maybe, we can derive only limited meaningful information regarding doping practices based on relative performances alone, the bio passport is working, Aldo Sassi is a man of integrity, and if those are true, the entire peleton is getting "cleaner", Cadel and Cunego are probably clean, and hence they rightly deserved their final standings in this yrs tdf.
The evidence supports my theory, not yours.