mountaindew said:
This article is so funny, it's really sad.
Two comments:
1) look at the date of publication: November 2010
then look at the last dataset they used: 2007
Hm, what happened in 2008 which could affect the conclusions?
And don't tell me data for 2008, and 2009 were not yet available to the author.
2) Once, you have pondered the first comment, check out this essay. Make sure to read at least up to figure 2.
Here are the cliff notes (very apt for today):
Imagine that a turkey is born on a farm. Every day, it is fed regularly and has a shelter to sleep in. For 1,000 days, the turkey has a very happy and perfectly content existence. The turkey wakes up on the 1,001st day and expects more of the same. However, that day is Thanksgiving and the turkey finds himself on the chopping block. The turkey used inductive reasoning to conclude that because every day so far had been happy, the next day must be happy as well, and his conclusion was obviously false.
Now go back to the 'American Thinker???' article and imagine why this guy left out data for 2008 and 2009. You see why it's utter cr@p? Ok, then let's flush it down the drain.
Happy Thanksgiving!
ETA: and +1 on rhubroma's explanation of Marxist analysis.