Brilliantly illustrated analysis of why Capatilism screws us.

[L'arriviste]

So we can print it on toilet paper then.

You are full of great ideas today.

I note that the quality of the debate seems to have gone somewhat downhill since last I checked on this thread.

 

[The Hitch]

I note that the quality of the debate seems to have gone somewhat downhill since last I checked on this thread.

You should see the General Politics thread

As for Thatcher..Your little disclaimers aren't fooling anyone..and quoting D'nish DeSouza...Please spare us your (not really) critical views on Ayn Rand and David Duke.

For those who dont know, David Duke = white supremacist, antisemite and former Grand Wizzard of the Kluk Klux Klan.

 

[redtreviso]

You should see the General Politics thread




For those who dont know, David Duke = white supremacist, antisemite and former Grand Wizzard of the Kluk Klux Klan.

and former Republican Louisiana state congressman.. Tell the class how wrong Janeane Garafalo is again?????

 

[Anonymous]

and former Republican Louisiana state congressman.. Tell the class how wrong Janeane Garafalo is again?????

Robert Byrd.

 

[The Hitch]

My comments on Janeane Garafolo as well as Sean Hannity Anne Coulter, Fox News and others who i identify as a problem in Americas political discourse are availble for anyone who wishes to see, on the General Politics thread. Here is a link

What isnt available for anyone to see is your reasoning as to why you make this accusation regarding Ayn Rand and David Duke.

I demand to know why i am getting called a sympathiser of the man who wrote this article - http://www.davidduke.com/general/go...as-chairman-of-the-republican-party_7443.html, and who led this organization.

This deserves a little more than your usual "Hitch your a Lance fanboy" (also bizzare) followed by a retreat.

 

[Hugh Januss]

So in order for me to qualify as a critical thinker, I must agree with your position.

Only in acedemicsSP will one ever see this. Sheer brilliance.

2X2=4 unless you believe it =5 and then that point of view is certainly valid too.

 

[redtreviso]

My comments on Janeane Garafolo as well as Sean Hannity Anne Coulter, Fox News and others who i identify as a problem in Americas political discourse are availble for anyone who wishes to see, on the General Politics thread.

What isnt available for anyone to see is your reasoning as to why you make this accusation regarding Ayn Rand and David Duke.

I demand to know why i am getting called a sympathiser of the man who wrote this article - http://www.davidduke.com/general/go...as-chairman-of-the-republican-party_7443.html, and who led this organization.

This deserves a little more than your usual "Hitch your a Lance fanboy" (also bizzare) followed by a retreat.

You demand????? LOL

I just figured you would soon be quoting Duke or Ayn Rand with a little non damaging, passive disclaimer as to your personal view of them,,,then go on to promote their schtick...Kind of like when people say "maybe I shouldn't say this" but of course they do.

 

[Anonymous]

2X2=4 unless you believe it =5 and then that point of view is certainly valid too.

The academic said;

Everybody's got their Truth, Scott SoCal.

In his world 2+2=whatever fits into his world view and the only correct answer is his.


But I'm closed minded, so wtf do I know?

 

[redtreviso]

The academic said;



In his world 2+2=whatever fits ito his world view, and the only correct answer is his.


But I'm closed minded, so wtf do I know?

..................not much

 

[Anonymous]

..................not much

We are just alike then.

 

[The Hitch]

You demand????? LOL

I just figured you would soon be quoting Duke or Ayn Rand with a little non damaging, passive disclaimer as to your personal view of them,,,then go on to promote their schtick...Kind of like when people say "maybe I shouldn't say this" but of course they do.

No this wont do. If you are going to make extreme accusations against others, man up and back them up.

What makes you think that i am a sympathiser of David Duke.

Im waiting for your reasoning.

 

[Anonymous]

No this wont do. If you are going to make extreme accusations against others, man up and back them up.

What makes you think that i am a sympathiser of David Duke.

Im waiting for your reasoning.

There is none. Why do you think he missed your point regarding Janeane Garofalo?

 

[redtreviso]

No this wont do. If you are going to make extreme accusations against others, man up and back them up.

What makes you think that i am a sympathiser of David Duke.

Im waiting for your reasoning.

Since you are so eager and persistent in the beatification of George W Bush it wouldn't surprise me for you to spout the redeeming qualities of David Duke..Seeing as you are so well versed in Right Wing ftardery as D'nish DeSooza.

 

[Anonymous]

Since you are so eager and persistent in the beatification of George W Bush it wouldn't surprise me for you to spout the redeeming qualities of David Duke..Seeing as you are so well versed in Right Wing ftardery as D'nish DeSooza.

Wow. That's the best you've got?

I know this wasn't addressed to me but as bombastic as you are I would have thought there might be something somewhat interesting you might come up with to back your assertion.

I'm dissappointed.

 

[The Hitch]

Wow. That's the best you've got?

I know this wasn't addressed to me but as bombastic as you are I would have thought there might be something somewhat interesting you might come up with to back your assertion.

I'm dissappointed.

You shouid also note that he has repeatidly called me a Lance fanboy.

Since i make absolutely no commehnts on Lance Armstrong threads, i have to wonder if he has made the same accusation against you Scott, seeing as you have been more right wing on these forums than i have.

 

[Anonymous]

You shouid also note that he has repeatidly called me a Lance fanboy.

Since i make absolutely no commehnts on Lance Armstrong threads, i have to wonder if he has made the same accusation against you Scott, seeing as you have been more right wing on these forums than i have.

Nope, but he's fond of Tea Party 'Alice in Wonderland' references.

 

[Anonymous]

My comments on Janeane Garafolo as well as Sean Hannity Anne Coulter, Fox News and others who i identify as a problem in Americas political discourse are availble for anyone who wishes to see, on the General Politics thread. Here is a link

What isnt available for anyone to see is your reasoning as to why you make this accusation regarding Ayn Rand and David Duke.

I demand to know why i am getting called a sympathiser of the man who wrote this article - http://www.davidduke.com/general/go...as-chairman-of-the-republican-party_7443.html, and who led this organization.

This deserves a little more than your usual "Hitch your a Lance fanboy" (also bizzare) followed by a retreat.

For the record, I put Garafolo in the same category as Hannity, Coulter, etc also. What a complete blowhard she is. Some people take themselves too seriously, and then some people go past that. She is in the latter category.

 

[The Hitch]

Since you are so eager and persistent in the beatification of George W Bush it wouldn't surprise me for you to spout the redeeming qualities of David Duke..

I had no intention of bringing David Duke into the "discussion".

But since you mention it, you might be interested to know that David Duke has similar opinions on George Bush as you do.

http://www.davidduke.com/general/cr...el-french-president-chirac-confirms_12021.htm


He even took a stand to defend Cindy Sheehan, heorine of the anti war movement.
http://www.davidduke.com/general/why-cindy-sheehan-is-right_350.html


So to say that someone may be a fan of David Duke, because they "beatify George Bush", is actually totaly wrong.

A bit of a fail. no?

 

[usedtobefast]

http://www.kontraband.com/videos/23558/Crises-Of-Capitalism/#show

meanwhile...

 

[redtreviso]

I had no intention of bringing David Duke into the "discussion".

But since you mention it, you might be interested to know that David Duke has similar opinions on George Bush as you do.

http://www.davidduke.com/general/cr...el-french-president-chirac-confirms_12021.htm


He even took a stand to defend Cindy Sheehan, heorine of the anti war movement.
http://www.davidduke.com/general/why-cindy-sheehan-is-right_350.html


So to say that someone may be a fan of David Duke, because they "beatify George Bush", is actually totaly wrong.

A bit of a fail. no?

I knew it... You already had david duke links ready to go..not that you are a fan or anything. eh eh

 

[Anonymous]

I knew it... You already had david duke links ready to go..not that you are a fan or anything. eh eh

Hey look, a new forum low. Congrats.

 

[patricknd]

Hey look, a new forum low. Congrats.

consider the source.............

 

[redtreviso]

Oh look...another emasculated republican...ohhhhhh so skeeery....

 

[Anonymous]

You're on a roll.

 

[redtreviso]

You're on a roll.

You got a kit like that when you dress up for your Dana Rohrabacher shindigs?