- Jun 14, 2010
- 34,930
- 60
- 22,580
Re:
Do you think radcliffe doped?
doolols said:I think I need to buy shares in tin foil. So many hats being made here.
I'm sure there were political implications of Kenny being DQ'd last night, but the real reason was that there was no conclusive proof they overtook the durny bike. Yes, from one particular angle it looked like they overtook it, but it was marginal As the British coach said, there was no finish line camera at the point where the durny comes off, and had Kenny been DQ'd, there would have been a huge protest and appeal. Not good for business. And, of course, allowing Kenny to restart meant they couldn't kick the German off for an even more clear infringement. So, all in all, a bit of a farce. But conspiracy? Nah.
And the Cav thing? Riders in the race recognised it wasn't deliberate. It's only non-riders in the Twittersphere that were howling for Cav to be DQ'd.
It's strange that so many people are convinced that Brits are doping. THEY HAVE PROOF! And that proof is - results. Which, of course, isn't proof, otherwise they'd be done for it. As someone said upthread, there has been nothing from riders, ex-riders, sacked riders, anyone, to say that GB / Sky are doping. Nothing. Zilch. Nada. I suppose the reason for that is that ... CONSPIRACY! Everyone is involved - UCI, Team GB, Sky, WADA, UKADA, yada yada yada.
Or, maybe, they really aren't doping.
Do you think radcliffe doped?
