strange to see that no one has said anything regarding the rigor of testing in UK. I definitely like to see how often has the brit anti-doping establishment actually conducted meaningful tests. Had to wait for the french report after tdf to see how often(?) french guys test.
as someone suggested earlier, the perception is that the number of successful british is very less. the nationalist in a brit will never accept that the podium finishers were doped. Also, in another reference to a doping instance, the response was that-must-be-one-off or we-XYZ-never-dope-like-the-rest.
personally, i believe that being born a brit or spaniard or from any other country doesn't stop anyone from doping. If language or culture was a criteria, then many countries wont feature in the doping list. Also, the economic or class argument is pure BS. Morally and ethically, people born to middle-class background are less likely to dope.
Argument regarding income doesn't make much sense too. The professionals who look to sports already know that they are probably going to earn more in a blue collar job than in their chosen sport. Only top athletes earn a decent income. all others earn either less than or on par with their national average.