How's this for a Hollywood ending? Lance sneaks away on the run into Paris and the whole peloton sits up and soft-pedals.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
ustabe said:It's not about winning. It's about cancer awareness.
ustabe said:How's this for a Hollywood ending? Lance sneaks away on the run into Paris and the whole peloton sits up and soft-pedals.
ustabe said:It's not about winning. It's about cancer awareness.
ustabe said:How's this for a Hollywood ending? Lance sneaks away on the run into Paris and the whole peloton sits up and soft-pedals.
ustabe said:How's this for a Hollywood ending? Lance sneaks away on the run into Paris and the whole peloton sits up and soft-pedals.
ustabe said:It's not about winning. It's about cancer awareness.
Moose McKnuckles said:Have fun spanking it to that fantasy while the rest of the world watches Lance lose time "on purpose."
ustabe said:How's this for a Hollywood ending? Lance sneaks away on the run into Paris and the whole peloton sits up and soft-pedals.
Thoughtforfood said:If by "cancer awareness" you mean "narcissism" then you have a point.
Cobblestones said:Somewhat off topic but related to this post, I always thought that the teams themselves are responsible for their accommodations?
Thoughtforfood said:Have you EVER looked in a mirror?
Moose McKnuckles said:I just think it's funny how you fanboys pretend Lance's dingleberries are actually chocolate bon-bons.
frizzlefry said:Says the guy day dreaming about LA's dingleberries.
ustabe said:Moose, you miss the point. That would would be what is called a "Pyrrhic victory."
shouldawouldacoulda said:No - its actually written into the UCI rules that the organizer has to provide meals and housing for teams (riders and staff) at all international races - including the Tour.
Teams often don't know until 1-2 weeks before the race where they'll be staying. Sometimes you don't know until you get there. Sometimes you know your first hotel a couple of weeks out, and the rest is a mystery 'till you get there. It really varies.
Section 2.2.009 and 2.2.010 of the UCI Road rules lay out the stipulations of participation allowances and obligations of the organizer for housing teams.
This pez article gives a pretty good overview of how it works too.
So if it only underlined Lance's irrelevance, a stage win would be a Pyrrhic victory, no? You don't think the peloton would soft-pedal out of respect, do you? Look, even if Contador gifted Rodriguez stage 12, he honored him by making him work for it.Moose McKnuckles said:Lance gave up winning the war many stages ago. If he wins a stage it'll be because he's completely irrelevant to the GC. Which would actually be more a slap in the face to his legacy rather than any meaningful addition to his palmares.
ustabe said:So if it only underlined Lance's irrelevance, a stage win would be a Pyrrhic victory, no? You don't think the peloton would soft-pedal out of respect, do you? Look, even if Contador gifted Rodriguez stage 12, he honored him by making him work for it.
Don't fight, we're working the same side of the fence, we just misunderstood each other.
Cobblestones said:Ah thanks for that. Now of course your answer made me ask a follow-up question:
You mention that the organizers have to provide housing and meals. Just a few weeks ago we had a thread about Saxo's new kitchen bus, which makes me suspect that most teams provide at least their own meals. Does it happen that teams make their own arrangements and decline what is provided by the organizers?
Onward, then!Moose McKnuckles said:Whether Lance wins a stage or not is entirely meaningless.
Moose McKnuckles said:Vino will chase Lance down and slap him with Cancellara's downtube motor.
schnebit said:God, this forum is sad.... really, really sad.