I don't think I've heard about headwind on Alpe d'Huez before, what do you base that on, Cookster15?
I read about that when it happened. I’ll try to find a link.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
I don't think I've heard about headwind on Alpe d'Huez before, what do you base that on, Cookster15?
Evans also didn’t ride the Giro and Menchov had crashed as well and more recently.Anyhow it was also too much for Menchov who also attempted to cross to Sastre and didn’t have Cadel’s disadvantages.
I agree with some of your other points and this is his change of mindset post worlds win.
I read about that when it happened. I’ll try to find a link.
Thanks!I think it may come from a finish line quote from Evans - it's in the Cyclingnews report for the stage (https://www.cyclingnews.com/races/tour-de-france-2008/stage-17/results/):
Evans lost 2'15 minutes on Sastre in L'Alpe d'Huez, finishing seventh. But the Australian played it cool, hoping to make up the gap again in the race's last time trial: "To be honest, I think it was not a time loss," he said in the finish. He started chasing Sastre and leading out the group by himself when the Spaniard's gap grew over two minutes. "There was no support, they all sat on. It was a headwind and the headwind probably worked in my advantage yesterday, but today they could obviously sit on the wheel and recover."
The bikeraceinfo website helpfully says the conditions were "a 10 km/hr breeze from the southeast", if you have any idea how to interpret that.
Significant wind also doesn't really fit with the climbing time, which seems pretty par for the 2008 course.Thanks!
While there may have been a headwind on some short sections, it doesn't sound like a headwind for the overall direction of the climb.
Cheers. I knew I heard it somewhere and I filed it away in 2008 but couldn't find the evidence to back that up. As Netserk points out the Alpe zig zags in an overall northeast direction. So overall more headwind but on some sections it would be a tailwind. And 10km/h isn't a strong breeze.I think it may come from a finish line quote from Evans - it's in the Cyclingnews report for the stage (https://www.cyclingnews.com/races/tour-de-france-2008/stage-17/results/):
Evans lost 2'15 minutes on Sastre in L'Alpe d'Huez, finishing seventh. But the Australian played it cool, hoping to make up the gap again in the race's last time trial: "To be honest, I think it was not a time loss," he said in the finish. He started chasing Sastre and leading out the group by himself when the Spaniard's gap grew over two minutes. "There was no support, they all sat on. It was a headwind and the headwind probably worked in my advantage yesterday, but today they could obviously sit on the wheel and recover."
The bikeraceinfo website helpfully says the conditions were "a 10 km/hr breeze from the southeast", if you have any idea how to interpret that.
Overall more tailwind than headwind (slightly), if it came directly from south-east.So overall more headwind but on some sections it would be a tailwind. And 10km/h isn't a strong breeze.
In fairness, the weather info is probably based on a regional forecast and the wind in the hills can run counter depending on the geography. I couldn't find much else to back up Evans' statement, though.Cheers. I knew I heard it somewhere and I filed it away in 2008 but couldn't find the evidence to back that up. As Netserk points out the Alpe zig zags in an overall northeast direction. So overall more headwind but on some sections it would be a tailwind. And 10km/h isn't a strong breeze.
I thin he wanst on EPO when he won the Tour as the most of cyclist on that year. He was always clean. But he coudnt win the Tour on his BEST years becouse the extended use of EPO those years. He won It when he wanst so good, but good enough to win le Tour, to be World Champion, he would have got one of the best palmares on history in another era...Maybe no with the names we have today, but yes at his era. No Merckx one, no Hinault...but close to this last in palmares IMO. I didnt like him too much, but he has a big meritI think he was on epo when he won his tour, but I'm sure there is no proof of it.