Angliru said:Maybe it's Levi's contention that with Horner continuing his tempo after reeling in Hesjedal, it tied Levi's hands, as was stated in the link in the OP's post, he couldn't continue on with Horner without pulling Hesjedal along. I'm assuming Hesjedal has a better sprint than the two of them or at minimum better than Levi, should they all had made it to the finish together. Possibly Levi felt he had the legs to match Horner. Horner's decision to go for his own interests after starting out as Leipheimer's lieutenant was a questionable, rather scandalous, and dastardly brilliant move. It's my guess it was around that moment that Leipheimer decided it was time for him to look into jumping ship, which he did.
And yet I never got the impression that Leipheimer was upset last year.Scott SoCal said:I don't really know why Levi was upset last year.
Leipheimer rode pace up Baldy - hardly a tactic of someone really ****ed off, and more importantly, precisely the tactic consummate team player.After Sierra Road he still had Baldy to go full gas and if Horner dropped, Horner dropped.
He could not drop him so he didn't win. If the better guy happens to be your teammate then that's not all bad.
And I'm just guessing that Horner is ticked because Rado Shack is a shell of a former squad with all hopes pinned on Schlecklet winning the upcoming Tour. IOW, Chris is stranded on a squad that can no longer fully support their less than marquee riders in lesser races. (and for a Bruneel team, everything is about the Tour.)I'm just guessing... but I think Horner likely was a little peeved at Levi getting upset last year. So now we have a little rivalry which is good.
benpounder said:And yet I never got the impression that Leipheimer was upset last year. Leipheimer rode pace up Baldy - hardly a tactic of someone really ****ed off, and more importantly, precisely the tactic consummate team player.
And I'm just guessing that Horner is ticked because Rado Shack is a shell of a former squad with all hopes pinned on Schlecklet winning the upcoming Tour. IOW, Chris is stranded on a squad that can no longer fully support their less than marquee riders in lesser races. (and for a Bruneel team, everything is about the Tour.)
Oh, BS.Caruut said:When angry, Levi rides pace.
When calm, Levi rides pace.
In the sun, Levi rides pace.
In the rain, Levi rides pace.
When happy, Levi rides pace.
When sad, Levi rides pace.
In spring, Levi rides pace.
In summer, Levi rides pace.
Levi, by Caruut.
Not meaning to come off overly condescending,
benpounder said:Oh, BS.
No, I understand why so many here love to hate Levi - he is a boring pro racer. But while so many love to hate his style, his results speak for themselves. And in the North American pantheon, there have been only two better riders (to date). And there are so many riders of other nationalities that so many here wish to fit the same bill but neither havent, or cant. Deep in the hearts, Levi's lifetime's results would be cherished by 99% of the peloton.
I recognize Levi's flaws, I only wish others would acknowledge theirs.
benpounder said:And in the North American pantheon, there have been only two better riders (to date).
CobbleStoner said:???what? only two? so what about John Howard, Andy Hampston, Tyler Hamilton, Alexi Grewal, Steve Bauer & Raul Alcala (both North American...), hell, even that rat Landis, they all are better racers than Levi
TRDean said:LOL...Raul Alcala??? Really....come on, other than Hampsten the others are only OK and not nearly as good as Levi. I hate Levi, but got to give credit where it is due.
Both of these riders are not my cup of tea...so all I can do is laugh at this.
hfer07 said:Horner has a big mouth-not really surprised by this![]()
What is BS is that you were not trying to be condescending, overly or not.Caruut said:Is it BS though?
No, let's not. Let us take the peloton as everyone who ever had dreams of cycling glory enough so that they joined a club, raced a few races, and put themselves into hurt just to get better. It constantly surprises me just how different those that comment here are from the general cycling population in terms of which riders are is worthy of scorn. We here are far more a cynical lot.Let's take the peloton to mean the WorldTour teams, which is 18 teams of 30 riders each.
benpounder said:And yet I never got the impression that Leipheimer was upset last year. Leipheimer rode pace up Baldy - hardly a tactic of someone really ****ed off, and more importantly, precisely the tactic consummate team player.
And I'm just guessing that Horner is ticked because Rado Shack is a shell of a former squad with all hopes pinned on Schlecklet winning the upcoming Tour. IOW, Chris is stranded on a squad that can no longer fully support their less than marquee riders in lesser races. (and for a Bruneel team, everything is about the Tour.)
First, time trials are incredibly boring in and of themselves. To say that Levi is more boring is akin to saying you like to watch green paint dry better than blue paint. More importantly, Levi has stood on the podium in three Grand Tours and at the Olympics - he has won 10 major stage races and has been his national champion in both road and tt. I'm not talking about whether or not you would like him on your team, I'm talking about his accomplishments.CobbleStoner said:Levi has never won a Grand tour, Levi has never won a Classic, Levi has never won an Olympic Gold medal, Levi is a boring TT specialist...
CobbleStoner said:you must not know who Steve Bauer is, much more than an OK rider, and I would take any one of those on my list (in their prime) over Levi as a teammate, or if I was the DS. Levi has never won a Grand tour, Levi has never won a Classic, Levi has never won an Olympic Gold medal, Levi is a boring TT specialist, Levi isn't always the best teammate. those five reasons right there take him way below #3 for USA, Canada, and Mexico combined all-time. get real
benpounder said:What is BS is that you were not trying to be condescending, overly or not.
No, let's not. Let us take the peloton as everyone who ever had dreams of cycling glory enough so that they joined a club, raced a few races, and put themselves into hurt just to get better. It constantly surprises me just how different those that comment here are from the general cycling population in terms of which riders are is worthy of scorn. We here are far more a cynical lot.
[my edit] closed quote tags
benpounder said:And yet I never got the impression that Leipheimer was upset last year. Leipheimer rode pace up Baldy - hardly a tactic of someone really ****ed off, and more importantly, precisely the tactic consummate team player.
And I'm just guessing that Horner is ticked because Rado Shack is a shell of a former squad with all hopes pinned on Schlecklet winning the upcoming Tour. IOW, Chris is stranded on a squad that can no longer fully support their less than marquee riders in lesser races. (and for a Bruneel team, everything is about the Tour.)
benpounder said:First, time trials are incredibly boring in and of themselves. To say that Levi is more boring is akin to saying you like to watch green paint dry better than blue paint. More importantly, Levi has stood on the podium in three Grand Tours and at the Olympics - he has won 10 major stage races and has been his national champion in both road and tt. I'm not talking about whether or not you would like him on your team, I'm talking about his accomplishments.
Don Johnson said:Levi is impressive. I venture to say he is the greatest American cyclist, after Lance, LeMond, Hampsten, Hamilton, Major Taylor, Landis, not necessarily in that order.
He may not be the most scintillating cyclist or person, but anyone with a good understanding of cycling should be able to appreciate Levi the athlete.
To measure his strengths in the GTs, and do well in the TT is just awesome.
Like Anquentil.
Also to measure in Levis' palmares it is important to factor PED use in the peloton, as that skews results.
joe1265 said:Levi and OPQS bluff one way, Horner calls it for what it is. Sagan wins everything. the race is shaping up nicely.
Caruut said:Not sure you Americans understand that no-one else cares about him being the 8th greatest American cyclist ever. Appreciate Levi the athlete? Why? He's good at TTing and riding pace up climbs. Better than I will ever be. He is not really in the same league as the best though. Nothing he does is what makes sport great, to me.
How different would Levi's palmarès be if you factor in PED use. I think there would be some change - all the dirty Euros taking results away from clean-as-a-whistle Levi, veteran of US Postal, Rabobank, Gerolsteiner, Discovery, Astana, Radioshack and OPQS. Don't want to go too clinic, but you can't just assert that he's definitely clean.
BroDeal said:Leipheimer is so pathetic that he had to dope as an amateur. Fact.
In a mythical clean sport, Leipheimer would be struggling to keep pace in crits held in industrial parks. So let's not go down the path of claiming that Leipheimer was robbed of results. That is laughable.
Horner, on the other hand, is the real deal, the most talented bike racer to come out of America since Lemond and Hampsten.
Caruut said:Not sure you Americans understand that no-one else cares about him being the 8th greatest American cyclist ever. Appreciate Levi the athlete? Why? He's good at TTing and riding pace up climbs. Better than I will ever be. He is not really in the same league as the best though. Nothing he does is what makes sport great, to me.
How different would Levi's palmarès be if you factor in PED use. I think there would be some change - all the dirty Euros taking results away from clean-as-a-whistle Levi, veteran of US Postal, Rabobank, Gerolsteiner, Discovery, Astana, Radioshack and OPQS. Don't want to go too clinic, but you can't just assert that he's definitely clean.
