Canadian WT Races: GP de Quebec (9/9) and GP de Montreal (11/9)

Page 17 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
theyoungest said:
Not gonna happen. That one's for Gesink, much more suited to him.

I wouldn't mind :p

Let's safe the 30th victory mile pole for Lombardia(or the Worlds, but we Belgians never have luck in that one...)

Gesink also favorite for Emilia and should be able to do something in Lombardia as well.

What I like about these races are the enormous wide roads that all seem to always go uphill :p

Roads are in amazing condition, you don't see that here in Belgium lol.

Phil needs to win the GP Montreal, Giro d'Emilia and Tre Valli Varesine before he retires though. He'd be the only person in history to have won all hilly classics during his career(you can't win races that didn't exist yet or don't exist anymore). Merckx never won Zurich-Metzgete for example. In the main part of his career(1969-1976) Zurich-Metzgete was won by 8 Belgians(!), but never by Merckx. Roger de Vlaeminck never won the Amstel Gold race and Tre Valli Varesine on the other hand.
 
Rabobank does need to make Montreal hard if Gesink wants to win. Still, having rewatched Quebec last lap a few times now, it really does seem to me Gilbert has endless reserves.

Everytime you think he will fall still he accelerates yet again.
 
Dekker_Tifosi said:
Rabobank does need to make Montreal hard if Gesink wants to win. Still, having rewatched Quebec last lap a few times now, it really does seem to me Gilbert has endless reserves.

Everytime you think he will fall still he accelerates yet again.

I don't know. If Gilbert was feeling that good I'm sure the margin would have been bigger. He was just doing enough to hold on. Gesink was great, usually nobody gets that close to Gilbert on that sort of course. There is no reason Gesink should not be getting better results in the Ardenne classics.
 
movingtarget said:
I don't know. If Gilbert was feeling that good I'm sure the margin would have been bigger. He was just doing enough to hold on. Gesink was great, usually nobody gets that close to Gilbert on that sort of course. There is no reason Gesink should not be getting better results in the Ardenne classics.
Even more weird...

Everytime after Ardennes we're convinced Gesink is more of a stage-racer. Yet all of his biggest successes and best races have come in one-day races. It's a total mystery
 
Aug 19, 2009
612
0
0
Dekker_Tifosi said:
Rabobank does need to make Montreal hard if Gesink wants to win. Still, having rewatched Quebec last lap a few times now, it really does seem to me Gilbert has endless reserves.

Everytime you think he will fall still he accelerates yet again.

2 extra laps, as you said, should help. Hopefully the hairpin before the start/finish doesn't bunch things up as much going onto the Camilien Houde climb as much as it did last year. It would have been nasty if they had hit the climb as strung out as they were.
 
Dekker_Tifosi said:
Even more weird...

Everytime after Ardennes we're convinced Gesink is more of a stage-racer. Yet all of his biggest successes and best races have come in one-day races. It's a total mystery

I say he should go for the one-day races. Seems to have the instinct for it.
 
Jun 18, 2011
195
0
0
zapata said:
I say he should go for the one-day races. Seems to have the instinct for it.

Also, there are fewer days in which he can crash :D

Seriously though, he should continue to do both. His increased tt ability this year would help with the gt's and the classics. But he really needs to do the Giro next year. The climbs at the Tour just don't suit him as well IMO.
 
Sep 18, 2010
71
0
0
So Montreal, who will make the final selection?

Is it going to be just the big guns from Quebec... Gilbert, Gesink, Uran, Ciolek (to surprise again), maybe hesjedal (he missed the break but looked good, same with Vandenvelde), Wegmann, Leukemans...

...anybody else likely to be in the mix that missed the break on Friday?
 
Hesjedal himself said he just didn't have the legs. So I wouldn't say he is looking good. Surely he is motivated, but motivation alone can't do it.

Can't help but think Hesjedal's 2010 season was an anomaly. He's not been performing at 2010 level the entire year
 
TV Broadcast for GP of Montreal

Québec
Évasion 10:30 am to 4:30 pm
Radio-Canada 3 pm to 4:30 pm

Canada & USA
Rogers Sportsnet 1:30 pm to 4:30 pm
Cycling TV USA 11 am to 4 pm
Setenta Sports September 13, 11 am to 2 pm
NESN September 25, 6 pm

Europe
Eurosport 2 6 pm to 10:30 pm GMT
British Eurosport 9:15 pm to 10:30 pm GMT

Asia
Eurosport Asie/Pacifique 6:30 pm to 10:30 pm GMT
Cycling TV Asia/Pacific 7 pm to 10 pm GMT
 
Jun 7, 2011
641
0
0
Is Gerrans in these races? I thought he was. Did he crash out?

So its expected to come down to a small group sprint? Cioleck would theoretically win that. I see a solo attack going away from about 3k out and then the other people in the group not committing to chasing him down.
 
Swede1 said:
Is Gerrans in these races? I thought he was. Did he crash out?

So its expected to come down to a small group sprint? Cioleck would theoretically win that. I see a solo attack going away from about 3k out and then the other people in the group not committing to chasing him down.

I doubt Ciolek will be in that last group, allthough he did surprise me in Quebec. Last year Gesink finished solo, but I don't think he will repeat that performance. The top 3 of Quebec could very well finish together.
 
Swede1 said:
Is Gerrans in these races? I thought he was. Did he crash out?

So its expected to come down to a small group sprint? Cioleck would theoretically win that. I see a solo attack going away from about 3k out and then the other people in the group not committing to chasing him down.
Gerrans is there but his form is always a bit random.

Last year Gesink stayed away because Sagan and EBH were in the 6 man group behind so no one wanted to drag those guys to the finish, this year Sagan isn't here and EBH has no form at all. I guess Ciolek could be in the same situation this year.
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
maltiv said:
Gerrans is there but his form is always a bit random.

Last year Gesink stayed away because Sagan and EBH were in the 6 man group behind so no one wanted to drag those guys to the finish, this year Sagan isn't here and EBH has no form at all. I guess Ciolek could be in the same situation this year.

But this time Gilbert is here and I doubt anyone will want to go with the finish line with him. Although Gilbert rarely waits for the sprint to win these days.
 
Swede1 said:
Is Gerrans in these races? I thought he was. Did he crash out?

So its expected to come down to a small group sprint? Cioleck would theoretically win that. I see a solo attack going away from about 3k out and then the other people in the group not committing to chasing him down.
Much too hard for Ciolek

Montreal is harder than Quebec. The climb is longer. If Rabobank again sets the plan to wear out the field like in Quebec then the field will be again much smaller than last year. (just like Quebec was much harder than last year..)
 
El Pistolero said:
But this time Gilbert is here and I doubt anyone will want to go with the finish line with him. Although Gilbert rarely waits for the sprint to win these days.
If anyone manages to drop Gilbert (which could maybe be done in this form), and he ends up in the case group, it's indeed a very real scenario nobody wants to work with him and the attacker ends up winning
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
I'll be rooting for Gesink at Montréal, to get a little variety instead of always rooting for Fast Phil in these races :p