Indeed, and leashing him to a train once more will ensure this never happens again. What a waste.Ruby United said:Definitely get Renshaw, who proved once again today he is about tactics, skill and wit, rather than speed.
Ruby United said:Definitely get Renshaw, who proved once again today he is about tactics, skill and wit, rather than speed. OPQS clearly have enough speed on the team but they need the experience at being a lead out (and Renshaw arguably has the most in the world) and a tactition in the sprints. And skip out Giro or just do half.
If anyone could get the stats in the amount of days Greipel, Cav and Kittel individually raced this year it could be interesting to compare.
Broth3r said:Indeed, and leashing him to a train once more will ensure this never happens again. What a waste.
Broth3r said:Indeed, and leashing him to a train once more will ensure this never happens again. What a waste.
Bavarianrider said:He doesn't have a train problem, he is simply facing a guy who is better than him,now. That's all.
And by never I mean reduced chances of doing so.Geraint Too Fast said:
Cute. Is that guy still alive?MatParker117 said:
Broth3r said:And by never I mean reduced chances of doing so.
Bavarianrider said:He doesn't have a train problem, he is simply facing a guy who is better than him,now. That's all.
King Boonen said:Any team with Cav in has to do the majority of the chasing, that's just the way it works. This year that meant Argos and Lotto swamping them in the final few km's and OPQS having nothing left.
Next year they need to make sure they have at least two guys who can go up the road (Chavanel and Uran?) and can challenge for a stage or two and put the pressure on the teams that are built purely for one rider (Argos and possibly even Lotto) to do the chasing. OPQS need to use their talented riders to their advantage.
In stage 6 and 10 they had Veelers sitting in nomansland, if anything makeng things harder to win the stage by increasing the gap between Kittel and Greipel. A very fine example of how not to do a proper leadout.Gogojv said:Actually you are wrong. Argos did several good leadouts.
A good lo is bringing your sprinter in a winning position. A winning position can also be in the wheel of Greipel or Cav.
There are several interviews after winning how they planned to do the sprint.
- first stage: argos was happy about lo. Final was very hectic. They had to change lo roles constantly and had to use up early their resources to keep the pack intact. Kittel was in good position against much weeker sprinters.
- Sagan won stage. Degenkolb was in perfect position in Sagans wheel. Degenkolb made mistake then to go early.
- Greipel should have won stage. Again veelers was in Greipel wheel and kittel behind cav. Not the best lo but good enough for kittel to win.
- Kittel vs Cav stage. Argos had planned to do a push till last corner and for veelers to deliver kittel behind cav or greipel. Veelers was injured so de Kort took over that role delivering kittel in cavs wheel.
- Paris stage. Everybody knows you have to be in perfect position in last bend and kittel was.
Argos plans every stage perfectly with a scientist. They also analysed Greipel, Cav strong points.
quote from de Kort. We might not have the most horsepower like a Tony Martin but we are a better team.
Jhan1908 said:My thoughts:
OPQS main objevtive next year should be to deliver Cav at the highest speed possible. I mean really, really fast. He had only two such sprints in this Tour, stage 5 and Paris. He won stage 5, and he was by far the fastest in Paris, closing almost three bike lengths on Kittel. Even though he came from behind, it was pretty impressive to watch.
As far as I can see, Cav has the best top speed, but Kittel thrumps him in acceleration. The best example was on stage 12 (?), where Kittel was overtaking Cav in the final 100m. This was not a very fast (for TDF) sprint, about 60-65 kph, which allowed Kittel to use his 1900 watts of acceleration to take down Cav.
If Cav is launched at 65+ kph, the acceleration rate will be much lower than at 60 kph, and the guy with the best top end usually wins. That would be Cav IMO. He is so much more aerodynamic, and at 70 kph this will give him a half kph or so on Kittel, even though Kittel has 300 watts higher peak.
Another example of Kittels extreme jump and acceleration, is the stage in Paris. He put almost a bike length on Greipel and Cavendish the second he got out of the saddle.
It really doesn't matter what kind of sprint it is, Kittel will outjump the other sprinters. Starting the sprint at very high speeds will help (but he will still have the best jump, ie Paris), so will starting the sprint from the front, and so will not riding the Giro.
MatParker117 said:Cobblestones at the tour may of helped solve Cav's leadout problem:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/tom-boonen-wants-to-return-to-tour-de-france
So with Petacchi, Renshaw and now Tom Boonen to come in Cav's train when the tour lines up in Leeds could be:
Kwiatkowski, Stybar, De Gendt, Terpstra, Bakelants, Martin, Boonen, Petacchi, Renshaw, Cav.
del1962 said:I though Uran was riding the tour which woul dgive you an 11 man team![]()
Afrank said:Scary strong team right there, can see the potential for Cav more then making up for this years tour with those guys at his disposal.
And with Uran wanting to do the Tour I foresee Lefevere having a hard time deciding what type of tour team he'll go with. Does he go with a power packed team designed around leading out Cav (and send Uran to Giro-Vuelta) or a more balanced team geared toward both Cav and Uran.