- Aug 4, 2011
- 3,647
- 0
- 0
Re: Re:
Why was Froome not 100% at the Vuelta. He had a 3rd week that was as strong as the tour. He cannot and has never done any better in a third week. He always has bad days. Bertie beat him in the tt so he had no advantage there as he expected.
Up against a Bertie on form, Froome knows , like he found out at the Dauphine that his early crazy attack only wastes his own energy.
Hayabusa said:ray j willings said:JRanton said:ray j willings said:willbick said:Contador rides like he's got one leg 6" shorter than the other
Perhaps the most insightful post ever on this forum.
Incredible analysis.
Do you have any scientific papers published?
I know you're understandably disappointed that your man has now gone six years without winning the world's biggest bike race but please don't take it out on fellow forum members.
It was a great win for Froome, but you have to admit that his form in this tour only confirms that his form at the Vuelta last year was as good as it gets. When he comes up against a strong Bertie or now a strong Quintana Froome will have to somehow improve if wants to beat them in GT.
like I said in a previous post a well deserved victory.
As I said in the Contador thread, neither were at 100 percent at that Vuelta and both deserve their respective GTs. We have not yet seen a 100 percent Contador vs a 100 percent Froome.
Why was Froome not 100% at the Vuelta. He had a 3rd week that was as strong as the tour. He cannot and has never done any better in a third week. He always has bad days. Bertie beat him in the tt so he had no advantage there as he expected.
Up against a Bertie on form, Froome knows , like he found out at the Dauphine that his early crazy attack only wastes his own energy.