Re: Re:
rick james said:
Galic Ho said:
Alpe d'Huez said:
Well, they were hammering way too hard it seemed to be that far from the finish. No one was going to attack and get away, so why ride that hard? That was the cause of the crash. But the entire peloton continued to put on full gas after that, causing Froome and Sky to chase like mad to catch back up, which is more taxing than
It's always hard to tell how much a crash affects a rider. There's no possible way Froome or the team are going to give us a hint, one way or the other.
This.
But the road always tells the story; Geraint Thomas at the Giro showed that. Landa lost far more time on the stage, over 5x more time than Thomas, but he finished the Giro!
Contador at the tour last year is an indicator.
Todays winners are the GC boys who kept themselves upright unscathed. They won.
Nope, winners are anyone in vortex skinsuits
You've been Rick rolled Rick James...
That post was made after stage 2.
And Sky boys hit the deck on that stage.
What? Did you miss the 'caption this' image Froome shared on social media?
As for the vortex suits. It's simple game theory.
Release info on them...have someone randomly bring them to the publics attention...everyone focuses on the suit and more 'marginal gains.'
It takes the focus off the real elephant in the room/Sky bus. What really increases time? More power.
Vortex suits or more power? It's a no brainer...more power every day of the week. It has more applications.
Sky throw a curve ball, it somehow miraculously only comes out at the Tour, where Sky miraculously have form for the first time as a team all season...hey it's the shirts!!
Nope. It was the boys turning the cranks that did it.