The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Nonsense. For a start, he gained a third of his final advantage on a descent. That's nothing to do with brute, crushing strength.Brullnux said:Everyone here is giving him way too much credit re tactics. Today was just pure, brute, demoralising, crushing strength. It's very easy to attack from 80km when you then gain 30-40 seconds on the way to Finestre. And Sestriere.
He climbed Finestre in 1:04 - 75km from the finish. Froome's in incredible shape.Bardamu said:Froome getting into form in the third week vs the rest of the peloton being dead by now.
Bardamu said:Froome getting into form in the third week vs the rest of the peloton being dead by now.
Thats and Dumoulain being massively overrated and everyone getting amnesia about the already well-rated Yates, Pozz, et alBardamu said:Froome getting into form in the third week vs the rest of the peloton being dead by now.
DFA123 said:Nonsense. For a start, he gained a third of his final advantage on a descent. That's nothing to do with brute, crushing strength.Brullnux said:Everyone here is giving him way too much credit re tactics. Today was just pure, brute, demoralising, crushing strength. It's very easy to attack from 80km when you then gain 30-40 seconds on the way to Finestre. And Sestriere.
And it's absolute bs to say its 'easy to attack from 80 kms'. It was a massive gamble - his team were in control of the stage at the time - he could have continued to grind it out for much further. But the gamble paid off and one which most other riders wouldn't have the balls to take.
The lengths to which some posters are going to disparage one of the all time great rides is bizarre to see. I'd have thought even the biggest Dumoulin fanboys could appreciate the drama on that stage.
It was barely a gamble. He needed three minutes, had nothing to lose and couldn't attack on Sestriere. He gained 50 seconds on a descent, yes, but never at any point, despite being alone for 80km, lost any time, apart from the final 600m. It was a very, very calculated risk, and one with minimal negative return. I don't think I'm disparaging it. It was the best ride, without doubt, since Landis. But that was down to legs, not tactics. Which doesn't make it any better or worse.DFA123 said:Nonsense. For a start, he gained a third of his final advantage on a descent. That's nothing to do with brute, crushing strength.Brullnux said:Everyone here is giving him way too much credit re tactics. Today was just pure, brute, demoralising, crushing strength. It's very easy to attack from 80km when you then gain 30-40 seconds on the way to Finestre. And Sestriere.
And it's absolute bs to say its 'easy to attack from 80 kms'. It was a massive gamble - his team were in control of the stage at the time - he could have continued to grind it out for much further. But the gamble paid off and one which most other riders wouldn't have the balls to take.
The lengths to which some posters are going to disparage one of the all time great rides is bizarre to see. I'd have thought even the biggest Dumoulin fanboys could appreciate the drama on that stage.
For being such a great TT'er, I don't have the impression that Dumoulin is a great rouleur.carton said:I said once that Froome was maybe the greatest roleur in the world but he was never really tested. That was and is still overstating it.
But still, all the guys saying over the years that Quintana should attack him over the valleys got a taste of what that would've looked like.
DFA123 said:Nonsense. For a start, he gained a third of his final advantage on a descent. That's nothing to do with brute, crushing strength.Brullnux said:Everyone here is giving him way too much credit re tactics. Today was just pure, brute, demoralising, crushing strength. It's very easy to attack from 80km when you then gain 30-40 seconds on the way to Finestre. And Sestriere.
And it's absolute bs to say its 'easy to attack from 80 kms'. It was a massive gamble - his team were in control of the stage at the time - he could have continued to grind it out for much further. But the gamble paid off and one which most other riders wouldn't have the balls to take.
The lengths to which some posters are going to disparage one of the all time great rides is bizarre to see. I'd have thought even the biggest Dumoulin fanboys could appreciate the drama on that stage.
Bardamu said:For being such a great TT'er, I don't have the impression that Dumoulin is a great rouleur.carton said:I said once that Froome was maybe the greatest roleur in the world but he was never really tested. That was and is still overstating it.
But still, all the guys saying over the years that Quintana should attack him over the valleys got a taste of what that would've looked like.
Bardamu said:Although you are not wrong, the irony is strong coming from the biggest Valverde fan of this forum.Koronin said:Actually I have less respect for him after today, and anything else I have to say only belongs in the clinic section of the boards.
Taxus4a said:If he do the double again this year, it would be 4 GT in a row, historic. But this year in the Tour he will face 2 superclimbers in the same team....but there is a long flat forst week much better for him. Froome will put in this first week and the first mountain stage big time to the climbers.
Taxus4a said:If he do the double again this year, it would be 4 GT in a row, historic. But this year in the Tour he will face 2 superclimbers in the same team....but there is a long flat forst week much better for him. Froome will put in this first week and the first mountain stage big time to the climbers.
Krzysztof_O said:Taxus4a said:If he do the double again this year, it would be 4 GT in a row, historic. But this year in the Tour he will face 2 superclimbers in the same team....but there is a long flat forst week much better for him. Froome will put in this first week and the first mountain stage big time to the climbers.
I don't think he'll win the Tour - the Giro was too hard and there'll be fresh competitors in this very mountainous Tour.
That being said, if he wins Giro tomorrow he'll make great history: non-calendar slam of all 3 GT - has there ever been a rider who was current winner of all 3 GT at some time?
Froome and Sky already went through the Lance playbook in 2013 and 2015 - utterly crushing everyone into the ground in both the TTs and the mountains.Koronin said:Bardamu said:Although you are not wrong, the irony is strong coming from the biggest Valverde fan of this forum.Koronin said:Actually I have less respect for him after today, and anything else I have to say only belongs in the clinic section of the boards.
My problem with Froome's performance today is that I now have more respect for Lance as a racer (not person, totally different issue) than I did before today.
Krzysztof_O said:Taxus4a said:If he do the double again this year, it would be 4 GT in a row, historic. But this year in the Tour he will face 2 superclimbers in the same team....but there is a long flat forst week much better for him. Froome will put in this first week and the first mountain stage big time to the climbers.
I don't think he'll win the Tour - the Giro was too hard and there'll be fresh competitors in this very mountainous Tour.
That being said, if he wins Giro tomorrow he'll make great history: non-calendar slam of all 3 GT - has there ever been a rider who was current winner of all 3 GT at some time?
Krzysztof_O said:Taxus4a said:If he do the double again this year, it would be 4 GT in a row, historic. But this year in the Tour he will face 2 superclimbers in the same team....but there is a long flat forst week much better for him. Froome will put in this first week and the first mountain stage big time to the climbers.
I don't think he'll win the Tour - the Giro was too hard and there'll be fresh competitors in this very mountainous Tour.
That being said, if he wins Giro tomorrow he'll make great history: non-calendar slam of all 3 GT - has there ever been a rider who was current winner of all 3 GT at some time?
Taxus4a said:Krzysztof_O said:Taxus4a said:If he do the double again this year, it would be 4 GT in a row, historic. But this year in the Tour he will face 2 superclimbers in the same team....but there is a long flat forst week much better for him. Froome will put in this first week and the first mountain stage big time to the climbers.
I don't think he'll win the Tour - the Giro was too hard and there'll be fresh competitors in this very mountainous Tour.
That being said, if he wins Giro tomorrow he'll make great history: non-calendar slam of all 3 GT - has there ever been a rider who was current winner of all 3 GT at some time?
He didnt star the Giro at his best....he is not tired this year. He had showed he can do 2 GT in a row very strong in both of them. Landa did lats year. He showed legs to have won both Giro and Tour.
The Tour is good for climbers, but the long forst week with cobbles is a big challenge for them.
He first have to win tomorrow the Giro, Domoulin is close, but Froome has a good recover and he is improving his shape. He has not a superteam, but he has a good team. Rain his is only treat for tomorrow IMO, at it was the day after Zoncolan, but the kind of climbs for tomorrow are very good for him, longs, hards but no superstep.
Well, I still don't like him as a person tbh. But I don't hate him by any means, and even if I did, Im sure I would be able to appreciate his effort today. Because if you don't, IMO, you are really not a real cycling fan. Because what he did today was amazing and something that happens very, very rarely. Of course the situation was perfect today, but still, not many had tried to go solo, its wildly different to what we have seen from Contador, Quintana and Nibali in the past where they have caught teammates in valleys etc and laid the foundations to victory. None of that happened today.Netserk said:While I didn't like him one bit the first couple of years after his transformation, I now often have wildly varying feelings towards him, but today was quite clear. What a ride. What a champion. This was so, so impressive. A miraculous comeback, and a mighty determination. It is the hope of witnessing such displays that is a large part of why I watch cycling.
Probably the strongest will in today's cycling.
This. I haven't been a fan of him either, but this kind of show is surely why everyone watches cycling. At least for those who are a fan of the sport itself primarily, rather than of individual personalities.Netserk said:While I didn't like him one bit the first couple of years after his transformation, I now often have wildly varying feelings towards him, but today was quite clear. What a ride. What a champion. This was so, so impressive. A miraculous comeback, and a mighty determination. It is the hope of witnessing such displays that is a large part of why I watch cycling.
Probably the strongest will in today's cycling.