i like chris but i hate guys making money not from pedalling but because writing some bullshiits on a paper
Race Radio said:l'Equipe today. Sky gives 2 years of data
![]()
maxmartin said:Sadly they used a scientist who once backed up la, almost said exact the same thing about la.![]()
Ryo Hazuki said:except that from la we didn't have his bloodpassport and froome we have![]()
Pricey_sky said:I was going to mention this, it's a great move by Sky. I guess they are fed up of having all their hard work questioned and this is a real step in the right direction. Hopefully if other teams have nothing to hide they will do the same.
It appears that was exactly the case today, SKY and Movistaroldcrank said:It was interesting to see Movistar riders at the SKY bus
congratulating Froomey. Perhaps a Pinarello coalition?
Actually it was silly tactics by Riis for the second day in a row.movingtarget said:Silly tactics by Sky today. Every time Porte went back to the front he put Froome in trouble. Froome did not have to attack. He should have let Quintana go and ridden at his own pace.
oldcrank said:Actually it was silly tactics by Riis for the second day in a row.
jens_attacks said:i like chris but i hate guys making money not from pedalling but because writing some bullshiits on a paper
maxmartin said:who are we? I don't think his blood value was released by SKY. And Grappes is very careful this time, he did not actually say Froom is clean, he only said his power data is consistent between Vuelta 2011 and now, and I think everyone can agree with that.
Quote from POUPOU
https://twitter.com/fredgrappe
He wrote: Did I say that Froome was clean?
He has tried to explain that he has seen no inconsistency within the 2011-2013 datas.
He seems to understand how some people can use or manipulate his words.
Forunculo said:The worst thing was Porte encouraging the rest to attack Froome tomorrow![]()
oldcrank said:Actually it was silly tactics by Riis for the second day in a row.
Actually it turned out to be almost exactly what happened!Publicus said:From the department of wishful thinking....
Yes it can be, but how can you say it was silly tacticsforkboy84 said:It can be silly tactics from both, they aren't related![]()
Right buddy, unconstructive = telling the truth. You will read us, you have no choice. 'cause somebody is going to quote uswwabbit said:Ignore list: Cimber, cineteq, RownhamHill, Ryo Hazuki, TANK91, the asian, thehog, Vino attacks everyone, webvan
- Don't bother replying to me, I can't and won't read your unconstructive rubbish
cineteq said:Right buddy, unconstructive = telling the truth. You will read us, you have no choice. 'cause somebody is going to quote us![]()
Kwibus said:So much boo'ing today. Allthough im very sceptical toward him being clean (sorry) i'm starting to like him if the boo'ing gets worse.
Usually has that effect on me.