Me every time I read one of Taxus' postsTaxus4a said:Froome is not just a very nice guy, it is a legend of cycling, it is a best now focused to perform.
And it is not a false champion as a lot in the past except Evans, Sastre, and a few more if we talk of Tours...
Taxus4a said:Froome is not just a very nice guy, it is a legend of cycling, it is a best now focused to perform.
And it is not a false champion as a lot in the past except Evans, Sastre, and a few more if we talk of Tours...
Taxus4a said:Froome is not just a very nice guy, it is a legend of cycling, it is a best now focused to perform.
And it is not a false champion as a lot in the past except Evans, Sastre, and a few more if we talk of Tours...
Põhja Konn said:Taxus4a said:Froome is not just a very nice guy, it is a legend of cycling, it is a best now focused to perform.
And it is not a false champion as a lot in the past except Evans, Sastre, and a few more if we talk of Tours...
You can say many things about Froome, but not that he is a cycling legend. He may yet become one, but time and odds are against him.
His main problem is that despite having almost perfect combination of abilities for GT GC-contender, he has won exactly 2 GT-s during four full seasons since his transformation/breakthrough. Not exactly prolific. Compare that to Contador, who won every single GT he entered from Tour 2007 to Giro 2011 (similar age and time-frame to compare with Froome 2011-15).
While Froome is one of the best GC-riders of his time, he doesn't look like a legend right now.
Taxus4a said:Põhja Konn said:Taxus4a said:Froome is not just a very nice guy, it is a legend of cycling, it is a best now focused to perform.
And it is not a false champion as a lot in the past except Evans, Sastre, and a few more if we talk of Tours...
You can say many things about Froome, but not that he is a cycling legend. He may yet become one, but time and odds are against him.
His main problem is that despite having almost perfect combination of abilities for GT GC-contender, he has won exactly 2 GT-s during four full seasons since his transformation/breakthrough. Not exactly prolific. Compare that to Contador, who won every single GT he entered from Tour 2007 to Giro 2011 (similar age and time-frame to compare with Froome 2011-15).
While Froome is one of the best GC-riders of his time, he doesn't look like a legend right now.
There are people all the day talking about people who is worse than Froome as if they are legends, so...
If you know me I dont talk about some people before 2011, for me that is a dark part of this sport, I can talk just about some people that era, an one is not Contador.
You has you opinion and I have mine, that is all. Truth is just one, maybe yours , maybe mine, of course I think is mine.. and facts give me reason.
MatParker1711 said:How is Froome not a legend? He's done things only Merckx, Coppi, Bartali, Maes & Bahamontes have also done.
del1962 said:Chris is back training and on his TT bike
![]()
del1962 said:Chris is back training and on his TT bike
![]()
SeriousSam said:del1962 said:Chris is back training and on his TT bike
![]()
Quintana and Contador (if expected average winning speed>50k/h, of course) will be quaking in their boots if 2013 time trialling Froome returns.
Lol!MatParker1711 said:How is Froome not a legend? He's done things only Merckx, Coppi, Bartali, Maes & Bahamontes have also done.
If Contador is in top shape Froome will be crying into his Team Sky approved pillow at night cause there'd be no way for him to take enough time in the ITT to make up for his losses in the mountainsSeriousSam said:del1962 said:Chris is back training and on his TT bike
![]()
Quintana and Contador (if expected average winning speed>50k/h, of course) will be quaking in their boots if 2013 time trialling Froome returns.
Of course not, SeriousSam is just being his usual self.Poursuivant said:Is the expected Average winning speed going to be that high though? I can't see it on those lumpy TT's.
LaFlorecita said:Me every time I read one of Taxus' postsTaxus4a said:Froome is not just a very nice guy, it is a legend of cycling, it is a best now focused to perform.
And it is not a false champion as a lot in the past except Evans, Sastre, and a few more if we talk of Tours...
![]()
I've posted that image as a response to Taxus at least once before. Maybe you copied me? Who knowsray j willings said:If you are going to copy one of my old posts at least give me a mention ...Thanks RayJ
rick james said:2 lucky GT wins??? The dawg should play the lottery every week if he has that sort of luck
ray j willings said:Froome 2 lucky GT wins ....
Bertie ...endless GT wins ....
Suck it up, Froome fan boys.
Froome is not half the rider Evans was. Evans was pure class in all kinds of races and but for bad luck would have won more tours and GT's.
Froome will never be a WC.
Taxus4a said:Põhja Konn said:Taxus4a said:Froome is not just a very nice guy, it is a legend of cycling, it is a best now focused to perform.
And it is not a false champion as a lot in the past except Evans, Sastre, and a few more if we talk of Tours...
You can say many things about Froome, but not that he is a cycling legend. He may yet become one, but time and odds are against him.
His main problem is that despite having almost perfect combination of abilities for GT GC-contender, he has won exactly 2 GT-s during four full seasons since his transformation/breakthrough. Not exactly prolific. Compare that to Contador, who won every single GT he entered from Tour 2007 to Giro 2011 (similar age and time-frame to compare with Froome 2011-15).
While Froome is one of the best GC-riders of his time, he doesn't look like a legend right now.
There are people all the day talking about people who is worse than Froome as if they are legends, so...
If you know me I dont talk about some people before 2011, for me that is a dark part of this sport, I can talk just about some people that era, an one is not Contador.
You has you opinion and I have mine, that is all. Truth is just one, maybe yours , maybe mine, of course I think is mine.. and facts give me reason.
You seem to mention the wind split stage a lot? Isn't riding in the wind part of cycling the dawg proved he can handle all condition unlike some, and it was Saxo that done the damage in the wind split, Froome just took ad advantage of their work...smart racing from him...,and that fact that Quintana could only attack Froome when he was ill tells you how strong the dawg was, Froome has won 2 GT because he has been the strongest rider, not because he was luckyray j willings said:rick james said:2 lucky GT wins??? The dawg should play the lottery every week if he has that sort of luck
His first win , there was no real fit competition.
2nd win. Quintana should have taken him to the cleaners. Bertie rode the Giro.
Froome got his time due to the wind split . No wind split and Quintana would have won although he would not have deserved it with his and Movies bad tactics [ to scared to attack]
Contador is clearly punchier than FroomePremierAndrew said:ray j willings said:Froome 2 lucky GT wins ....
Bertie ...endless GT wins ....
Suck it up, Froome fan boys.
Froome is not half the rider Evans was. Evans was pure class in all kinds of races and but for bad luck would have won more tours and GT's.
Froome will never be a WC.
When was Bertie WC? I seemed to have missed it. Froome is more likely to ever win a big one day race than Contador given that his acceleration is sharper than Contador's.
(Well, I guess I replied to it, so maybe not all that pathetic)
