Teams & Riders Chris Froome Discussion Thread.

Page 870 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

Is Froome over the hill?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 42 34.4%
  • No, the GC finished 40 minutes ago but Froomie is still climbing it

    Votes: 65 53.3%
  • No he is totally winning the Vuelta

    Votes: 28 23.0%

  • Total voters
    122
Oct 3, 2021
2,538
2,435
8,680
his career has been finished full stop years ago

that maybe so in terms of results, but it seems incredibly churlish to criticise that aspect, given both crashes were life threatening, and there are plenty of riders who achieved great results, and then coasted through their latter years.

so why keep kicking a dog when its down ? I dont get the pleasure some take from it.
 
May 5, 2010
51,756
30,310
28,180
that maybe so in terms of results, but it seems incredibly churlish to criticise that aspect, given both crashes were life threatening, and there are plenty of riders who achieved great results, and then coasted through their latter years.

Personally, I found it a bit hard to take it seriously when he kept claiming he was back to his pre-2019 crash levels, even though it pretty obvious he wasn't.
And even if he was... well... don't think it would have helped him much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: red_flanders
Jul 7, 2013
8,181
15,049
23,180
Maybe a contract with UAE? They lost Majka & Ayuso and even if Froomey misses a few watts to win the Tour then being Pogi's superdom (and finishing as a runner-up) isn't that bad either.

I was sympathetic when he had his big crash in 2019. But it’s getting long in the tooth now. He should just formally announce his retirement and put us out of his misery.

He lost a good chance to win #5 then. Bernal & Thomas would've been great super-doms and others weren't good enough to threaten him.
 
Oct 3, 2021
2,538
2,435
8,680
Personally, I found it a bit hard to take it seriously when he kept claiming he was back to his pre-2019 crash levels, even though it pretty obvious he wasn't.
And even if he was... well... don't think it would have helped him much.

I suspect he was telling the truth fwiw, as we've heard from plenty retiring pros in the last few years how its now full gas from the start of stages and everyone's hitting sustained watt levels that would have been thought insane maybe a decade ago.

Its just Froome could never keep up with that increase, whether thats because he hit his peak capability or his crash fundamentally dropped his peak not sure, but thats why he got left behind
 
Apr 3, 2009
12,658
8,581
28,180
I suspect he was telling the truth
To my mind, if you ever hear yourself saying that about Froome, it's probably a good time to check yourself.
fwiw, as we've heard from plenty retiring pros in the last few years how its now full gas from the start of stages and everyone's hitting sustained watt levels that would have been thought insane maybe a decade ago.

Its just Froome could never keep up with that increase, whether thats because he hit his peak capability or his crash fundamentally dropped his peak not sure, but thats why he got left behind
There's no chance Froome doesn't know how those gains were made, and I don't buy for a second he was ever back to his winning numbers. He's just been laughably off the back most of the time he was spouting that nonsense. Then the bike fit nonsense, then the seat height...

The simple answer which aligns perfectly with everything else we've see from Froome is that he's just a habitual liar.
 
Oct 3, 2021
2,538
2,435
8,680
To my mind, if you ever hear yourself saying that about Froome, it's probably a good time to check yourself.

There's no chance Froome doesn't know how those gains were made, and I don't buy for a second he was ever back to his winning numbers. He's just been laughably off the back most of the time he was spouting that nonsense. Then the bike fit nonsense, then the seat height...

The simple answer which aligns perfectly with everything else we've see from Froome is that he's just a habitual liar.

If that's what you want to believe, then that's what you'll always believe and there's no point bothering to discuss it further.